Viewing profile — Someone1234
Someone1234
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 2:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 51,762
- Public activity
- 8,035 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Someone1234
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49082607
I completely agree. I think LLMs may have a role in security posture, specifically flagging/identifying potential threats for human review . But a Zero Trust/Access Controls should…
-
comment
Comment #49040122
What does copyright have to do with anything? You also cannot copyright an encryption algorithm , but the US Government banned essentially mathematics for YEARS[0]. [0] https://en.…
-
comment
Comment #49025985
I've looked into this extensively in the US, and there are three headaches from my POV: 1. Most states require special device certification by a "nationally recognized authority" t…
-
comment
Comment #49023642
> US real median household income has been steadily rising[1] for the last 40+ years. Compare it to the Consumer Price Index: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUUR0000SA0R
-
comment
Comment #49021657
And they've provided no technical explanation of how... This may be an odd reference, but I remember this song and dance with Roomba Vs. Roborock. "Roborock stole our IP!!!" but th…
-
comment
Comment #49011275
Right; but THAT idea is consumer hostile by design. So your account is now tied to a physical device; great, but the device is dead, or you own a dozen devices, now what? Each vend…
-
comment
Comment #49010618
> There is no need or advantage to a full frontal assault. Perhaps, but in the last year China did build these: https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/03/stairway-to-tai...
-
comment
Comment #49010054
Then most of us would never use it. That means either: - Only one specific device can ever login (bad). - It doesn't limit login to one specific device, therefore it does nothing. …
-
comment
Comment #49009889
Less work today or less work tomorrow? The problem with "someone makes a request, code changes happen automatically, and all someone else has to do for that to be committed is mash…
-
comment
Comment #48996817
I suspect they're ignoring that debate since they have reason to anticipate a US Government action that allows them to not need to compete in a free market.
-
comment
Comment #48980865
That has been my experience too. It will cost you more than it saves to use smaller Chinese models to code; because of the repeated work. That has been slowly changing recently, bu…
-
comment
Comment #48958294
You're much more "glass half full" than me, but one can dream.
-
comment
Comment #48958148
That's great, thank you. What's frustrating about that is that Microsoft has also gone out of their way to make it difficult to access the [legacy] System Properties (sysdm.cpl), w…
-
comment
Comment #48958114
> The graph is not presenting a narrative, did you mean to reply to someone else who is presenting the "revisionist history"? The title of this thread is "What AI did to stackoverf…
-
comment
Comment #48957295
ChatGPT was released in Nov 2022, and frankly wasn't very good originally. The SO decline started occurring almost two years ahead of that, and was already on a sharp decline befor…
-
comment
Comment #48957240
The monitor itself isn't installing anything, Windows detects the device by unique ID, and uses Windows Update to get the driver which itself triggers a Windows Store application (…
-
comment
Comment #48957226
Worth noting that gpedit.msc isn't included in Windows Home editions (although there are unsupported ways of adding it). This is also technically asking a lot for working around is…
-
comment
Comment #48852170
I'd agree it is similar to Anthropic's naming scheme, which I'd argue shares the same problems as this. It improves marketability/googlability, but decreases actual comprehension. …
-
comment
Comment #48850962
> When do you use GPT-5.6-Max-Low vs. GPT-5.6-Plus High? You don't, because that isn't something I proposed using for model naming. I called them GPT-5.6-Max, GPT-5.6-Plus, and GPT…
-
comment
Comment #48849798
That isn't what "genuinely asking" looks like, you're criticizing using "questions" as cover. It isn't subtle, nor is it constructive. I agree with them, Sol, Terra, and Luna are c…
-
comment
Comment #48835025
I too found this with their previous attempts. I have my Chat personality settings stripped right down to no-fluff. I'd want voice to be more akin to the Star Trek computer, and le…
-
comment
Comment #48819585
Blizzard is such a shell now, that I doubt we'd notice.
-
comment
Comment #48779841
I consider reasoning to be a huge quality differentiator particularly for complex questions/medium+ length discussions. Low-Thinking/non-Thinking absolutely has a place, but not in…
-
comment
Comment #48733469
That edge case is certainly their official excuse. Ultimately to determine the underlying root-cause you'd still need to dig this same information out, and all they've done is move…
-
comment
Comment #48732948
For most here, I don't think this article contains new information. The actual interesting discussion, to me, is why Microsoft won't show WHO is dangling the handle open when the u…