Viewing profile — SmirthsDAC
SmirthsDAC
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 5:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 29
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SmirthsDAC
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30643187
An oppressed people - the Jews, have become oppressors? This comment doesn't even attempt to draw the distinction between the government of Israel and the Jewish people. How would …
-
comment
Comment #27791614
> I'm going to strongly disagree with that, and not sure how you decided that was objectively true. My argument was to point out a lack of good reason in the first place to have co…
-
comment
Comment #27791457
> It strikes me as a genuine and reflective post from someone who cares, and I would hate to see others use "you are both legally adults" to avoid doing similar reflection. However…
-
comment
Comment #24201288
>> Organic for the most part is a myth. What they do is either spray with a pesticide that can be classified as organic That's demonstrably untrue. Many organic methods use no pest…
-
comment
Comment #24200737
Organic and sustainable methods are more efficient, even without GMOs [1]. It is a myth that GMOs or high-tech is the answer to food production/land scarcity concerns, as simply ma…
-
comment
Comment #19231338
True, but the Great Oxygenation Event took an extremely long time to effect most species though, and there are certainly exceptions, but that's just it, they're exceptions. Humans …
-
comment
Comment #19231096
>But it's no more or less "natural" than ever. "Natural" is probably not that useful a concept in general, it doesn't really mean anything in general, just like it doesn't mean any…
-
comment
Comment #18818272
Requiring that it has "plane-ness" seems like an unpackable ambiguous criteria. I am speaking on a simple functional level. Rather, a given iron atom is one of the atoms that make …
-
comment
Comment #18818194
>Now, if you want a particle to be conscious, your minimum expectation should be that the particle can change. The crux of the argument seems to be here, and is simply a fallacious…
-
comment
Comment #18711871
Layman here, are there any serious limitations to your approach, or is it fair to say with the algorithms and hardware you have that motion planning has essentially been "solved"? …
-
comment
Comment #18565060
So a wider age range is inappropriate for your age? 27-35 seems fairly narrow. What are your limits for appropriate age range?
-
comment
Comment #18523274
So people should ignore a counterargument that makes sense to them because Terry Gross has more experience? We should blindly follow authority in spite of our own reasoning abiliti…