Viewing profile — SkyBelow
SkyBelow
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 05, 2019, 4:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,850
- Public activity
- 1,536 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SkyBelow
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49181925
If there is enough cross over between real world knowledge engrams and abstract knowledge engram, would this allow for the jump? One interesting (albeit sad) area which might be re…
-
comment
Comment #49168650
I don't agree, especially for this argument. I'm a major AI user. Coding? Sure. But language learning, some art projects, TTRPG design. I'm so far 'lost' that I have a number of AI…
-
comment
Comment #49156623
>LLM responses are certainly not idempotent, as they are not even deterministic. Isn't that more due to an optimization and not how the LLM itself runs? Like a MoE LLM run on a sin…
-
comment
Comment #49156323
Isn't the real difficulty in how vulnerabilities can be mixed? A given vulnerability might be extremely hard to execute, but very damaging. Another vulnerability might be easier to…
-
comment
Comment #49096919
Hmm... does this mean we could see AI worm evolution now? In the past, a worm couldn't really evolve unless it was coded to do so, and only to the extent it was coded. But an LLM w…
-
comment
Comment #49088048
I feel the magic in math is that the notation is to a more universal sort of language, and the e^x captures that. e^x means that infinite series, but it means a few other things at…
-
comment
Comment #49020741
>These two points seem slightly conflicting. Why if a human is truly more creative than AI, must it experience "the magic and absurdity of life" if it can be creative without "comb…
-
comment
Comment #48978149
How errors add depend upon how you treat them. Two independent task? You have a 95% chance of each task being correct, so total success is .95^2 = 90.25% correct. Having two AIs ve…
-
comment
Comment #48911663
I see an AI as an advanced calculator, but I see even a simple calculator as a poison to education if not strongly controlled. Number sense is such a nebulous concept, but it captu…
-
comment
Comment #48817260
That entirely depends upon the cost of preventing them. At no cost, sure. But nothing is ever free. So what is the cost. There is also the consideration of if a crime being a crime…
-
comment
Comment #48804966
>Many developers are too focused on delivery value compared to maintenance cost. The way this is worded feels like it leaves the blame on developers. Aren't these developers focuse…
-
comment
Comment #48763147
Are court decisions universally recognized? If a court rules someone true in one area, couldn't it still be considered slander/libel in another area if another court rules it as no…
-
comment
Comment #48762136
I think it might be built on something more than deterministic systems. Some property that is a subset of deterministic, so all your argument still apply, but merely being determin…
-
comment
Comment #48686029
>The parents job is to keep their kids out of trouble. I challenge that anyone believes this, and for my evidence, I would submit all the age based laws that protect children regar…
-
comment
Comment #48673824
Never really like this because it feels some arbitrary as to what counts as making a claim. Human language is filled with implications, and those implications are filled with impli…
-
comment
Comment #48584663
But why does it do so inconsistently, and sometimes even forgetting to swap back to English when it comes time to do 'normal' output? It also seems recent, as when I was using deep…
-
comment
Comment #48584622
>and everyone else will poor and unemployed How so? Everyone would still have their skills to provide goods and services and everyone would still have wants for other's goods and s…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48489933
I don't think that is the argument. The argument is more "I want to do good thing X, but it will also cause bad thing Y." followed by "Wait, bad thing Y is going to happen anyways,…
-
comment
Comment #48476823
Is this self contradictory? Making a claim of 3 star service, without providing 3 star service evidence, isn't any different than a claim like they don't clean the dishes enough. S…
-
comment
Comment #48462288
One of the major concerns with prototyping, at least in my experience and based on the general vibe I've felt from others over the years, is that clients will generally do some var…
-
comment
Comment #48412852
Does the model need to offer new testable hypothesis if it provides a way of explaining existing results that current models can't? If it is competing against another model that do…
-
comment
Comment #48360172
Didn't the original authors end up leaking this before OpenAI fixed it? They gave them a chance, but then had to decide between staying fully silent or publishing the details despi…
-
comment
Comment #48356028
>responsibly disclosed Isn't this a double plus good phrase? What makes this more responsible? Reasoning about first order effects of different disclosure models? But what if someo…
-
comment
Comment #48324990
Nothing of the level of rocket failure, but I've tracked down issues where you are never sure of the cause. You keep the doubt and let it drive you. You aren't as much sure of a th…