Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — SinParadise

SinParadise

HN member
Joined
Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 3:19 AM UTC
HN karma
217
Public activity
71 items

About SinParadise

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49038381

    Its the same "solved" pattern, but with the pattern being more deeply rooted in a project.

  2. comment
    Comment #37501238

    Its OK magic of technology will swoop in and save us. Any time now.

  3. comment
    Comment #37446787

    >I don't think React ever pitched view as a function of state actually. Many in the community latched onto that, and some React-inspired projects tried to make that a thing, but I'…

  4. comment
    Comment #37446590

    > We very rarely need specific minerals. Because historically we do not have technology complex enough to need specific minerals. Now we do. > Most of these needs we can fulfill wi…

  5. comment
    Comment #37438925

    >If we really can't find any more, then billions or trillions of dollars will be redirected to bring lithium extraction from seawater to commercial scale. And we are probably going…

  6. comment
    Comment #37438665

    > We have not run out of any mineral ever and I don't believe we ever will. Is mineral not a finite resource? I don't understand your source of optimism here.

  7. comment
    Comment #37437298

    That imo is our only way out, but this is effectively deus ex machina moment for humanity.

  8. comment
    Comment #37437256

    Based on his calculations from a video a year ago. He projects that we would need 940M tons of lithium, while 2022 reported reserves is 95M tons.[0] Are we going realistically find…

  9. comment
    Comment #37437091

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBVmnKuBocc Long video, but informative. TLDR: We don't have enough minerals (including reserves) to completely switch our energy from ff to renewab…

  10. comment
    Comment #37420795

    Thats a cool project. >But I don't think the "pretend it isn't" makes any sense Well, let me expand a bit more. React's pitch is that view is a function of state, and essentially d…

  11. comment
    Comment #37414196

    I mean, I am OK with magic, but it has to remain magical to me. The moment I have to deal with the magic, I don't want it anymore.

  12. comment
    Comment #37414142

    I like Svelte. It embraces the fact that UI is stateful and doesn't try to pretend it isn't.

  13. comment
    Comment #37408813

    Not useEffect specifically, but wiring something very stateful like a map library into the React rendering paradigm while keeping the state management in React via useState etc. ca…

  14. comment
    Comment #37374965

    70 year old enterprise telecom, but in F#? You guys have any blog posts detailing this transition?

  15. comment
    Comment #37367249

    Not sure if Kotlin is conductive to currying. I find it harder to read with currying, not easier.

  16. comment
    Comment #36433177

    Zoom is said to be easy to use for voip, but I found discord to be vastly superior in terms of ease of use and config. Basically all the ceremonies and friction of the networking a…

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #36185171

    Nothing here directly addresses the issue of users migrating away from the flow of `Google search -> SO` to `ChatGPT/Phind`. Maybe SO should just acquihire Phind. Use Phind as the …

  19. comment
    Comment #35677708

    I'd say depends on the complexity of the logic itself. I would never write triggers with any logical branching, but for simple update table B when table A is updated? I definitely …

  20. comment
    Comment #35677088

    Also plays into the trend of "lets hire fullstack devs AKA frontend devs that knows how to call APIs and have a vague understanding of transactions and its pitfalls" and offload al…

  21. comment
    Comment #35677037

    This is trading architectural complexity with integration complexity. You can learn to architecture better, but you can never get better at duck taping together the capricious and …

  22. comment
    Comment #35327866

    So basically, using $ with expressions and no side-effects within the expression will not cause the issue the article is having?

  23. comment
    Comment #35158019

    Funny, I had just watched Plan 75 yesterday.

  24. comment
    Comment #35026958

    No because you have to be actively looking to be counted as unemployed.

  25. comment
    Comment #34881143

    The invisible hand of the labor market will solve this issue.