Viewing profile — SinParadise
SinParadise
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 3:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 217
- Public activity
- 71 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SinParadise
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49038381
Its the same "solved" pattern, but with the pattern being more deeply rooted in a project.
-
comment
Comment #37501238
Its OK magic of technology will swoop in and save us. Any time now.
-
comment
Comment #37446787
>I don't think React ever pitched view as a function of state actually. Many in the community latched onto that, and some React-inspired projects tried to make that a thing, but I'…
-
comment
Comment #37446590
> We very rarely need specific minerals. Because historically we do not have technology complex enough to need specific minerals. Now we do. > Most of these needs we can fulfill wi…
-
comment
Comment #37438925
>If we really can't find any more, then billions or trillions of dollars will be redirected to bring lithium extraction from seawater to commercial scale. And we are probably going…
-
comment
Comment #37438665
> We have not run out of any mineral ever and I don't believe we ever will. Is mineral not a finite resource? I don't understand your source of optimism here.
-
comment
Comment #37437298
That imo is our only way out, but this is effectively deus ex machina moment for humanity.
-
comment
Comment #37437256
Based on his calculations from a video a year ago. He projects that we would need 940M tons of lithium, while 2022 reported reserves is 95M tons.[0] Are we going realistically find…
-
comment
Comment #37437091
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBVmnKuBocc Long video, but informative. TLDR: We don't have enough minerals (including reserves) to completely switch our energy from ff to renewab…
-
comment
Comment #37420795
Thats a cool project. >But I don't think the "pretend it isn't" makes any sense Well, let me expand a bit more. React's pitch is that view is a function of state, and essentially d…
-
comment
Comment #37414196
I mean, I am OK with magic, but it has to remain magical to me. The moment I have to deal with the magic, I don't want it anymore.
-
comment
Comment #37414142
I like Svelte. It embraces the fact that UI is stateful and doesn't try to pretend it isn't.
-
comment
Comment #37408813
Not useEffect specifically, but wiring something very stateful like a map library into the React rendering paradigm while keeping the state management in React via useState etc. ca…
-
comment
Comment #37374965
70 year old enterprise telecom, but in F#? You guys have any blog posts detailing this transition?
-
comment
Comment #37367249
Not sure if Kotlin is conductive to currying. I find it harder to read with currying, not easier.
-
comment
Comment #36433177
Zoom is said to be easy to use for voip, but I found discord to be vastly superior in terms of ease of use and config. Basically all the ceremonies and friction of the networking a…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #36185171
Nothing here directly addresses the issue of users migrating away from the flow of `Google search -> SO` to `ChatGPT/Phind`. Maybe SO should just acquihire Phind. Use Phind as the …
-
comment
Comment #35677708
I'd say depends on the complexity of the logic itself. I would never write triggers with any logical branching, but for simple update table B when table A is updated? I definitely …
-
comment
Comment #35677088
Also plays into the trend of "lets hire fullstack devs AKA frontend devs that knows how to call APIs and have a vague understanding of transactions and its pitfalls" and offload al…
-
comment
Comment #35677037
This is trading architectural complexity with integration complexity. You can learn to architecture better, but you can never get better at duck taping together the capricious and …
-
comment
Comment #35327866
So basically, using $ with expressions and no side-effects within the expression will not cause the issue the article is having?
-
comment
Comment #35158019
Funny, I had just watched Plan 75 yesterday.
-
comment
Comment #35026958
No because you have to be actively looking to be counted as unemployed.
-
comment
Comment #34881143
The invisible hand of the labor market will solve this issue.