Viewing profile — SilasX
SilasX
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Dec 06, 2011, 4:03 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 17,769
- Public activity
- 8,743 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SilasX
Github: http://github.com/SilasX/
email: sbarta@gmail.com
Location: Austin, TX (left the Bay Area August '18).
Studying infosec to make a new career out of it.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/silasbarta; my proof: https://keybase.io/silasbarta/sigs/EIsQUp3Ln8z5fOgzWFj9alDI8Ci9Vl4JSgP5OZQcmjU ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49170476
I wasn't saying that this invalidates the objection. I was (very clearly) asking them to lead by example. Regardless of the legal structure, the non-profit should still be calling …
-
comment
Comment #49138820
Mozilla is leveling this criticism? How about leading by example? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15940144 Thanks to altairprime for mentioning it first: https://news.ycombina…
-
comment
Comment #48884222
I'm a little bothered by the reddit discussion, which dismisses the concern because it was tested on a machine with "only" 32 GB RAM, and normalizes letting apps get bloated: https…
-
comment
Comment #48833267
Yes, it's not an identical situation, but I thought it was relevant because of the concept of recovering a dead body's resources for consumption by the remaining living humans.
-
comment
Comment #48831867
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri: "It is every citizen's final duty to go into the tanks, and become one with all the people."
-
comment
Comment #48801115
For the reason the article gives: products would be labeled with the thing that actually matters for safely maximizing producing usage -- how long it's safe to actually use the pro…
-
comment
Comment #48786679
Agreed. In this case, a better title would be "California replaces 'Sell by' Labels with 'Use by', Hoping to Cut Food Waste" Still a simplification, but doesn't horribly mislead yo…
-
comment
Comment #48733770
Okay but in this case, the act, if successful, would have the outcome that it prevents recovery of critical evidence in a homicide, so yes that would count as obstruction. It didn'…
-
comment
Comment #48702855
What point that I made are you responding to? I was disputing someone’s appeal to a specific intuition for being an unhelpful one to use here. So I obviously get the concept of som…
-
comment
Comment #48702838
I get that involving a human body complicates the analysis. That was the point: that you can’t appeal to it as a simple example to ground the intuition in other case. Also: >Stacki…
-
comment
Comment #48695408
Okay but that depends on the intuitions the question is trying to justify, which makes it circular. We also know, for example, that the body uses more than twice as much energy to …
-
comment
Comment #48571903
I mean, this has long been a loophole in US law. Generally, you can't be compelled to testify against yourself (5th Amendment). But when it comes to taxes: 1) You have to declare a…
-
comment
Comment #48377575
I'm aware I can read the prospectus. And, to the extent that I found the relevant portion of the prospectus (that you could have done yourself and posted) here's what I see: >The F…
-
comment
Comment #48377167
Sure, I was simplifying a bit with the technicals. But you're sure their leeway is enough that they can say "nah, we don't like what the index is doing now, we'll do our own deviat…
-
comment
Comment #48375015
No, that's not all. They had additional criteria that they changed right when big-name companies wanted to get added. Now, if they had historically gone by pure market cap, and the…
-
comment
Comment #48374887
This. I don't mind having a phone call, but I do mind wasting time on it by repeating everything that they could have learned about me before the call and running into sanity check…
-
comment
Comment #48372224
>Correction: index funds don't have a choice. They must follow the index, and so must buy the stock. Right, if they've advertised as an S&P 500 index fund, they have to robotically…
-
comment
Comment #48285571
Yeah, you are being pedantic. The clear meaning is that you're not just allowed to insure arbitrary properties. If you wanted to correct a misconception, you should provide a bette…
-
comment
Comment #48238172
>This essay on Japan's corporate diversification and physical tacit knowledge is an interesting read. However, as an East Asian, my assessment is that this system is heavily driven…
-
comment
Comment #48164644
Yeah I'm hesitant to take a strong opinion on this given how many of the replies could themselves be AI, or humans counter-trolling by baiting him to say "aha! I got you!" to the m…
-
comment
Comment #48140500
Heh, one time when I got this style of question[1] (but for JavaScript), I took a glance at it and said "Um ... you really shouldn't write code like that." The interviewer replied,…
-
comment
Comment #48140437
Haha agreed, but remember, it's posted on lit[erature]hub, not tech[nical]hub.
-
comment
Comment #48041798
Whoa there. The US being wrong to make war in Vietnam absolutely does not vindicate those who supported the Viet Cong!
-
comment
Comment #48036830
Yeah, I was surprised to learn that Ticket to Ride (downloaded on Steam) uses like a half gigabyte, but the most data-intense thing it does is a few musical tracks and 2D images wi…
-
comment
Comment #47788807
Goodhart's law does not cleanly apply here, because the group cares about more than making money, and would bear all the costs of not doing (what observers regard as) being in thei…