Viewing profile — ShamelessC
ShamelessC
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 8:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,803
- Public activity
- 2,331 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ShamelessC
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40261425
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40260502
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40260026
:shrug: Well, I thought this was funny. For what it's worth.
-
comment
Comment #40241751
Okay well let's just agree to disagree then.
-
comment
Comment #40241433
It’s not flamebait. There was no deliberate attempt to piss people off. That it happened to anyway is entirely the fault of those outraged. It’s a relevant fact. People just get in…
-
comment
Comment #40241369
That doesn’t sound super sketchy or anything.
-
comment
Comment #40241027
This is confusing to me as I thought the simple act of measuring the wave collapsed the wavefunction.
-
comment
Comment #40241015
Sad that so many investors/founders couldn't figure this out themselves.
-
comment
Comment #40228520
I guess people can’t handle that one of their favorite writers did something despicable. No need to downvote so much, just comes across like you’re trying to conceal the truth, whi…
-
comment
Comment #40228316
It’s a practice, but not necessarily a standard one. In any case if even one person sees that, the advice will have served its purpose.
-
comment
Comment #40217241
And bizarrely different plot points.
-
comment
Comment #40206641
> No criticism at this particular thing, but it is a good opportunity to mention that GPT-5 only exists if you have non-public information. What? > Sure it does. What? Contradictin…
-
comment
Comment #40206609
You’re aware that by prompting it in that way you’re effectively telling it to role play in a fictional scenario?
-
comment
Comment #40206242
So do you just have a list of like thousands of specialized discord servers for every question you want to ask? You're the first person I've seen who is actually _fond_ of discord …
-
comment
Comment #40196140
I mean, yeah I was having a tough time understanding it. I felt like my comment conveyed my confusion pretty well. I still think the wording is strange and the most clarifying thin…
-
comment
Comment #40196114
One of many, yes.
-
comment
Comment #40196021
> AI generates image > Bots congratulate it > It learns to generate images more like it > Images become even more deformed I think it’s pretty unlikely that they are instantly fine…
-
comment
Comment #40195958
That’s because it is clickbait. Self awareness doesn’t even have a proper testable definition much less verified proof via experiments that wouldn’t immediately be questioned as ph…
-
comment
Comment #40195903
Didn’t the media cover this already over and over since ChatGPT’s inception? Not that it isn’t important but to imply it is a new revelation seems sensationalist. > While inaccurat…
-
comment
Comment #40194788
With all due respect, the people on HN are _weirdly_ in favor of a group whose unstated “zeroth” tenet is basically “be born into wealth, get extremely lucky, disregard common crit…
-
comment
Comment #40187256
Looks handy. How reliable would you say it is?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40165424
This tweet sucks. Provide some context, perhaps? Why would firing the Python team make Google more competitive at GenAI? I can think of only mild correlations between those two thi…
-
comment
Comment #40115945
> Then I could use it as a monitor without jumping through a bunch of hoops. bold of you to assume your hdmi cable won't naturally form some hoops.
-
comment
Comment #40101750
You think heroin addicts don’t quit simply because they’re too lazy?