Viewing profile — ScottAaronson
ScottAaronson
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 1:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 657
- Public activity
- 94 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ScottAaronson
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17537148
Thanks! In theoretical computer science as a whole, authorship is only for those who made a direct intellectual contribution. It’s one of the things I like best about the culture o…
-
comment
Comment #17492580
No, I hadn't seen that paper; thanks! I don't want to comment on it without having studied it, except to mention that it doesn't make any reference to Forrelation.
-
comment
Comment #17465899
Pretty much any intro to QC (and in particular, any of the intros I've written, and linked to elsewhere on this thread) will make the point about Hilbert space (that's what it's ca…
-
comment
Comment #17439588
Results from inductive inference show that you’re not going to converge in general . In the specific case of chess, however, my point was that we, because we know the complete list…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17435303
Just as a quick followup: Avishay Tal has confirmed for me that, indeed, their proof still goes through if you replace the Fourier transform by any other unitary matrix with bounde…
-
comment
Comment #17433563
Knowing more math than most of the people who you pass on the street, but at the same time having vastly inferior social skills to them, is something that you sort of get used to i…
-
comment
Comment #17433539
I’m not sure I fully understand your argument, but if someone showed that they could perfectly predict the actions of the people around them, say hours or days into future, placing…
-
comment
Comment #17433530
Short answer: not in any obvious way! Longer answer: whatever I have to say about possible implications of QC for the hard problem of consciousness, you can probably find in the fo…
-
comment
Comment #17433519
No, I don’t think humanity is well placed to be responsible wielders of quantum computing. But the thing is, we’re even less well-placed to be responsible wielders of nuclear weapo…
-
comment
Comment #17433504
When the quantum computation is finished, you suck it up and you measure. The entire point of the quantum algorithm was to set things up in such a way that, even as the measurement…
-
comment
Comment #17433491
If you mean, quantum computers that would exploit a nonlinear term in the Schrödinger equation to solve NP-complete and even harder problems in polynomial time (as studied by Abram…
-
comment
Comment #17433376
Honestly, almost all of the technical innovation in this breakthrough had to do with classical circuit complexity—-once you know my Forrelation problem, there’s almost no further i…
-
comment
Comment #17432876
Right, but even if chess were infinite, we could still imagine an algorithm that would output the smallest explicit rule set that was consistent with all the games it had seen so f…
-
comment
Comment #17432861
While I was on sabbatical: 7am - Wake up, eat breakfast, check email, help get daughter ready and walk her to school 9am - Back to sleep 2pm - Wake up again, shower, eat lunch, che…
-
comment
Comment #17432634
My favorite part of my sabbatical in Tel Aviv was having some actual time to do research. My second-favorite part was the hummus. Forrelation is not a “guiding light for quantum de…
-
comment
Comment #17432582
I think that the teaching of QM has already been impacted by quantum information—and I hope it gets impacted more, regardless of if and when we get useful QCs! To my mind, it’s jus…
-
comment
Comment #17432485
If anything like that turned out to be true, and fundamental (rather than just an engineering limitation), I’d regard it as a shocking discovery that would overturn our current und…
-
comment
Comment #17432456
The reason why the running time of Grover’s algorithm involves sqrt(n) has to do with the Pythagorean theorem—or if you like, the fact that quantum mechanics is based on the 2-norm…
-
comment
Comment #17432317
There are at least two plausible solutions to the Dice Room, depending on whether you adopt SSA or SIA. I wish I knew something more insightful to say about it than that, but I sti…
-
comment
Comment #17432089
It’s funny: when Philip Roth passed away recently, I was rereading some of his stuff, and thinking to myself, “why am I so terrible at writing?” If I have any tips, I guess they’d …
-
comment
Comment #17432080
I hope in 5-10 years, but really I don’t know, and no one else does either.
-
comment
Comment #17432064
There’s no question that celebrity can get to your head in this line of work. Every single time I get off my private plane somewhere, I’m mobbed by quantum complexity theory groupi…
-
comment
Comment #17431882
I confess I get annoyed when people make arguments about the interpretation of quantum mechanics using complicated thought experiments involving lasers and mirrors. Why not just ta…
-
comment
Comment #17431869
As far as I know, it would have zero effect on any of that ... unless you need to simulate quantum physics or chemistry, factor large integers, calculate discrete logarithms, or po…