Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Schroedingersat

Schroedingersat

HN member
Joined
Fri, Nov 19, 2021, 10:55 PM UTC
HN karma
1,113
Public activity
2,195 items

About Schroedingersat

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #36339120

    [flagged]

  2. comment
    Comment #36338800

    The difference is a solar farm consists of 4 million identical modules and a quarter billion identical cells. If a cell is faulty, it decreases output of that module by 2%. If a mo…

  3. comment
    Comment #36337675

    Yes. The capacity factor is a blatant lie given that units 1 & 2 are about 60%, and the costs are an old estimate of overnight cost without escalation or inflation. Comparing overn…

  4. comment
    Comment #36337594

    > But at the same time, it's kind of odd he didn't notice people from his own side peddling blatant lies. Bit odd not to notice all the lies he's telling even after they're pointed…

  5. comment
    Comment #36335808

    [flagged]

  6. comment
    Comment #36335759

    The USA quotes AC capacity, costs and power. So a 100MW plant in the US quoted at $110 million including the cost of finance, profit margin, regulatory compliance, insurance and tr…

  7. comment
    Comment #36335536

    The idea that this hasn't been tried repeatedly is a myth.

  8. comment
    Comment #36322158

    You're amortising the cost over a time period that is in direct contradiction to reality, at an EAF that is in direct contradiction to reality at a cost of capital that doesn't ref…

  9. comment
    Comment #36322050

    > The local Wikipedia says nuclear ramps up or down at 5%/min. This is faster than any other method of generation. How is paying extra to ramp at 5%/min once a day "faster than" be…

  10. comment
    Comment #36322025

    Why do that, when you can just present the surplus/deficit coldest-sunniest day in late spring and pretend it is an essential aspect of all renewable generation?

  11. comment
    Comment #36308105

    You see, that's the greenwashing bit. It's not made from water, it's made from fossil gas. All these schemes to increase demand aren't about making electrolysers to replace existin…

  12. comment
    Comment #36304741

    Hydrogen has a GWP of 11. Cube square law also makes small scale hydrogen storage more expensive than batteries. Then you're back to limited niche uses, or needing expensive, leaky…

  13. comment
    Comment #36304644

    The mirai has worse range, has less power, is heavier, has less internal space, is bigger, requires more mining if rare minerals for fuel cells, lasts fewer miles before replacing …

  14. comment
    Comment #36235525

    A laptop powerbank cost about as much as those and will run enough lighting to read for days. Lower cost than that, there are C-grade prismatic cells. Usb/12V adapters exist for a …

  15. comment
    Comment #36235453

    Rough service incandescent bulbs are exempt and will last decades driven at a quarter power. Sure it's a special order, but it's a special case.

  16. comment
    Comment #36235408

    You actually think this is convincing. Wild.

  17. comment
    Comment #36226455

    Very nice attempt at gaslighting, but claiming it's "partially spent fuel" and that calling it waste is a lie is like claiming shit is "partially eaten food" because you can still …

  18. comment
    Comment #36226414

    What are you even talking about?

  19. comment
    Comment #36223191

    > The big lie is calling it waste; "partially spent fuel" is more accurate Which you doubled down on twice, before backpedalling and claiming you never meant that the *other* 99% o…

  20. comment
    Comment #36223182

    No, see I answered the actual question, which is oil. Which is mass limited. With how much energy would be available to do work at the destination. You jumped to a ship two orders …

  21. comment
    Comment #36220336

    You are attempting to insinuate that reprocessing will eliminate the nuclear waste and obviate mining new U235. It does neither. Stupid semantic games and motte and bailey rhetoric…

  22. comment
    Comment #36220321

    > Liquid natural gas is less dense than water, so of course ocean transportation of it is not mass limited. Did it really no occur to you that I was referring to transportation of …

  23. comment
    Comment #36210092

    Yes. You could have done that rather than comparing to a ship two orders of magnitude larger. That wouldn't have been a ridiculous attempt to mislead.

  24. comment
    Comment #36209994

    The relevance is that fertile material is not "partially spent fuel" in any extant fuel cycle. First it does nothing to the fission products (which are the bulk of the radioactive …

  25. comment
    Comment #36209941

    Also false. LNG carriers are volume limited. Hence Q-Max vessels carrying about 100,000 tonnes vs bulk carriers of similar length carrying 400,000 tonnes. Also I said useful energy…