Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — SaxonRobber

SaxonRobber

HN member
Joined
Sat, Dec 28, 2019, 11:35 PM UTC
HN karma
66
Public activity
88 items

About SaxonRobber

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23180901

    I wanted to like Reason, but it is now clearly a dead end. Its torn identity between JS and OCaml has killed the language.

  2. comment
    Comment #23174451

    Imagine believing this

  3. comment
    Comment #23101114

    Spoken like a bootcamp luddite

  4. comment
    Comment #22979401

    Because it lowers the housing stock in urban areas. Wealthy travellers will pay more for accommodations than the local market, so apartments become airbnbs and investors gobble up …

  5. comment
    Comment #22979354

    Airbnb was supposed to be a platform for sharing your house, not starting your own distributed hotel.

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #22870380

    The corporate structure institutionalizes immorality, it cannot be avoided. By law shareholder profits come first, everything else is secondary to that goal.

  8. comment
    Comment #22870346

    The person filing the paperwork still isn’t necessarily the one who made the call. In fact, it usually isn’t; they are just the ones whose responsibility it is to carry it out, or …

  9. comment
    Comment #22870170

    It is my experience that everyone who self identifies as a republican or democrat is brainwashed at this point. The worst offenders are those who are so delusional that they mock a…

  10. comment
    Comment #22870109

    Investment is gambling, smarts are winning.

  11. comment
    Comment #22868124

    can we get compile time constant variables? something cleaner than enums and defines

  12. comment
    Comment #22845156

    That excludes a huge number of students who will have never had the experience to try programming before university. I never did any programming before my first year, I was plannin…

  13. comment
    Comment #22843715

    This is only true if your applications are mostly high level glue.

  14. comment
    Comment #22834576

    But it is. A good compiler could unroll my loop and rewrite it with the appropriate vector ops. But that isn’t possible with just python right now.

  15. comment
    Comment #22834530

    Damn you’re edgy

  16. comment
    Comment #22828378

    This is a pretty pedantic definition. Plenty of excellent programmers are not mathematicians. How would that work if programming were just math? That’s like saying physics is just …

  17. comment
    Comment #22827556

    Go succeeded because it was largely ignored by Google. Dart was the darling language which flipped miserably and has only recently became relevant.

  18. comment
    Comment #22827460

    They are proven with with math, but their implementation in code certainly isn’t. If it were that simple, we would be using languages like Coq and TLA+ for writing software. But we…

  19. comment
    Comment #22827244

    I think only academics with a background in CS will typically be familiar with functional programming. For everyone else, they will have used something simpler like Excel, C, R, Py…

  20. comment
    Comment #22827211

    This is actually one of the most frustrating parts about using python. You can’t write normal python code that performs well. Instead you have to use the numpy dsl, which I often f…

  21. comment
    Comment #22826690

    My analogy was to compare wood and vinyl as building materials for flooring (I guess I omitted that) and asking if the existence of something newer invalidates something older. I a…

  22. comment
    Comment #22825298

    Julia is similar to matlab by design, which makes it easier for science and engineering folks who are already familiar with it. I think functional programming advocates underrate s…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #22819843

    Why does a language need changes to be alive? We don’t ship languages, we ship code written in them. It’s like claiming wood is dead because we have vinyl.

  25. comment
    Comment #22819827

    At what point is enough enough?