Viewing profile — SaxonRobber
SaxonRobber
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 28, 2019, 11:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 66
- Public activity
- 88 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SaxonRobber
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23180901
I wanted to like Reason, but it is now clearly a dead end. Its torn identity between JS and OCaml has killed the language.
-
comment
Comment #23174451
Imagine believing this
-
comment
Comment #23101114
Spoken like a bootcamp luddite
-
comment
Comment #22979401
Because it lowers the housing stock in urban areas. Wealthy travellers will pay more for accommodations than the local market, so apartments become airbnbs and investors gobble up …
-
comment
Comment #22979354
Airbnb was supposed to be a platform for sharing your house, not starting your own distributed hotel.
-
comment
Comment #22872555
Probably
-
comment
Comment #22870380
The corporate structure institutionalizes immorality, it cannot be avoided. By law shareholder profits come first, everything else is secondary to that goal.
-
comment
Comment #22870346
The person filing the paperwork still isn’t necessarily the one who made the call. In fact, it usually isn’t; they are just the ones whose responsibility it is to carry it out, or …
-
comment
Comment #22870170
It is my experience that everyone who self identifies as a republican or democrat is brainwashed at this point. The worst offenders are those who are so delusional that they mock a…
-
comment
Comment #22870109
Investment is gambling, smarts are winning.
-
comment
Comment #22868124
can we get compile time constant variables? something cleaner than enums and defines
-
comment
Comment #22845156
That excludes a huge number of students who will have never had the experience to try programming before university. I never did any programming before my first year, I was plannin…
-
comment
Comment #22843715
This is only true if your applications are mostly high level glue.
-
comment
Comment #22834576
But it is. A good compiler could unroll my loop and rewrite it with the appropriate vector ops. But that isn’t possible with just python right now.
-
comment
Comment #22834530
Damn you’re edgy
-
comment
Comment #22828378
This is a pretty pedantic definition. Plenty of excellent programmers are not mathematicians. How would that work if programming were just math? That’s like saying physics is just …
-
comment
Comment #22827556
Go succeeded because it was largely ignored by Google. Dart was the darling language which flipped miserably and has only recently became relevant.
-
comment
Comment #22827460
They are proven with with math, but their implementation in code certainly isn’t. If it were that simple, we would be using languages like Coq and TLA+ for writing software. But we…
-
comment
Comment #22827244
I think only academics with a background in CS will typically be familiar with functional programming. For everyone else, they will have used something simpler like Excel, C, R, Py…
-
comment
Comment #22827211
This is actually one of the most frustrating parts about using python. You can’t write normal python code that performs well. Instead you have to use the numpy dsl, which I often f…
-
comment
Comment #22826690
My analogy was to compare wood and vinyl as building materials for flooring (I guess I omitted that) and asking if the existence of something newer invalidates something older. I a…
-
comment
Comment #22825298
Julia is similar to matlab by design, which makes it easier for science and engineering folks who are already familiar with it. I think functional programming advocates underrate s…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #22819843
Why does a language need changes to be alive? We don’t ship languages, we ship code written in them. It’s like claiming wood is dead because we have vinyl.
-
comment
Comment #22819827
At what point is enough enough?