Viewing profile — Sagiri
Sagiri
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 28, 2016, 2:09 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 10
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Sagiri
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16407091
The difference is that a big part of YT's appeal is how open it is. Anyone can post pretty much anything. With something like Udemy, where you have to pay for courses, Udemy needs …
-
comment
Comment #13005129
Ethical violations are an endemic problem. If everybody named and shamed companies for every ethical violation they encounter, every company would end up named and shamed. And the …
-
comment
Comment #12902379
I'm not. Undefined behavior is 'anything goes'. An implementation can choose a particular behavior that you can rely on for a particular case of UB, because, if the only rule is th…
-
comment
Comment #12902247
We just need to remove the Electoral College and use a straightforward majority wins (or plurality, as the case may be).
-
comment
Comment #12894896
It isn't? At least that would be a failure at compile-time, rather than run-time.
-
comment
Comment #12893324
You weren't replying to me, but I genuinely do keep my phone on silent (no, not vibrate) and will never answer it (both because it's rude and because I don't notice it). But I do t…
-
comment
Comment #12892884
Well, yeah. If you have any reason to suspect that you will need to run your code on other platforms or compile with other compilers, don't do compiler-specific things. Just do it …
-
comment
Comment #12892820
If the semantics of casting pointers of wrong alignments were defined to be demons flying out of your nose, it would be perfectly acceptable to rely on that behavior.
-
comment
Comment #12892642
The correct and portable solution is to not use uint32_t, but to use uint8_t, and construct the integers manually.
-
comment
Comment #12892624
If a particular compiler specified that casting pointers of wrong alignments causes a segfault, it'd be perfectly acceptable to rely on that behavior. The standard would consider i…
-
comment
Comment #12760250
Rust is basically a safe C++, written by people who like functional languages. Also, it has an official package manager in Cargo, something that C++ lacks completely. As such, it t…
-
comment
Comment #12703317
Personally, I would rather builds be slow than have my build mysteriously break when I'm in that 1%.
-
comment
Comment #12597717
> There is no mechanism for you to mark a function as potentially crashing your teammate’s code or for specifying how to process an exception. Maybe I'm misinterpreting this, but i…