Viewing profile — SabrinaJewson
SabrinaJewson
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 09, 2023, 4:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 80
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SabrinaJewson
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48316271
As the creator of a library that lets you import Markdown into Typst directly in the Typst build process, without the use of external tools like Pandoc, I confess I find it this al…
-
comment
Comment #47775052
Related is the paper [What is a closed-form number?], which explores the field E, defined as the smallest subfield of ℂ closed under exp and log. I believe the set of numbers that …
-
comment
Comment #47579211
How does that relate at all? Classical logic is not any less rigorous than other kinds of logic.
-
comment
Comment #47578803
I do not think this parallel works, because I think you would struggle to find a discipline for which this is not the case. It is trivial to enumerate all the possible scientific o…
-
comment
Comment #47097438
In general in Rust, “length” refers to “count”. If you view strings as being sequences of Unicode scalar values, then it might seem odd that `str::len` counts bytes, but if you vie…
-
comment
Comment #46983632
You’re ignoring the obvious reason, aside from the network effect: there are no alternative solutions. Some people are building Discord alternatives but they are far from productio…
-
comment
Comment #46156149
You can claim that “learning disability” should mean whatever, but this does not change the fact that medical experts define “learning disability” such that they do not inherently …
-
comment
Comment #46154237
You know that “learning disability” isn’t a synonym for “stupid”, right? We neither call people who are less academically able “disabled”, nor are disabled people necessarily less …
-
comment
Comment #46153838
I don’t know why you’re so angry at this statement, because it’s factually true. Do you truly believe that the proportion of families who stigmatize mental health care is negligibl…
-
comment
Comment #46008009
100%. The school and the Internet are the two places children can encounter opinions different from their parents’ for the first time. With an increase in homeschooling and recent …
-
comment
Comment #45895859
This comment contains a lot of false information. I’m first going to point out that there is a model of Lean’s type theory called the cardinality model, in which all types of equal…
-
comment
Comment #45883503
In type theory, all singleton types are isomorphic and have no useful distinguishing characteristics (indeed, this is true of all types of the same cardinality – and even then, com…
-
comment
Comment #45837387
Well, Ladybird appears to be getting a headstart on having detractors.[0] [0]: https://drewdevault.com/2025/09/24/2025-09-24-Cloudflare-and...
-
comment
Comment #45741779
What about DEI makes it an “ideological” movement as opposed to other movements who are presumably not ideological? And I’m not sure what “most people”, is supposed to mean; you do…
-
comment
Comment #45475731
Ferrocene is a specification but it’s not a formal specification. [Minirust]( https://github.com/minirust/minirust ) is the closest thing we have to a formal spec but it’s very muc…
-
comment
Comment #45398446
“Natively” is important here because it’s actually relatively easy to get it working with a package: https://github.com/ntjess/wrap-it
-
comment
Comment #45109768
English alternatives like “The staff enjoyed it later” or “The staff had the pleasure of eating it later” I would expect come across more euphemistic than normal to the average Eng…
-
comment
Comment #45070320
No, because you only have to choose _one_ s for the proof to work, and a finite number of choices is valid in intuitionistic and constructive mathematics.
-
comment
Comment #45069033
> Addressing your issue directly, the Axiom of Choice is actively debated: The axiom of choice is not required to prove Cantor’s theorem, that any set has strictly smaller cardinal…
-
comment
Comment #45068669
> For example, the idea that there are the same number of integers as even integers is a stupid one that in the end does not lead anywhere useful. I am not sure what you are arguin…
-
comment
Comment #45068604
We can work with unnameable things very easily. Take, for instance, every known theorem that quantifies over all real numbers. If you try to argue that proving theorems about these…
-
comment
Comment #45068487
I don’t know about you, I can work with it just fine. I know its properties. I can manipulate it. I can prove theorems about it. What more is there? In fact, if you are to argue th…
-
comment
Comment #44777124
It’s less nice from a computational perspective. But almost no mathematicians care about computation – they care about semantics, and there is no sense in which Lean’s quotients ar…
-
comment
Comment #44281347
You need some source of infinite-ness, otherwise the entire theory can be modelled by finite sets. It can be provided by the natural numbers or W types or inductive types, but the …
-
comment
Comment #44277385
> Is there anything more primitive than the inductive data type? I believe that the natural numbers are more primitive than inductive data types, since all inductive data types may…