Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — RyEgswuCsn

RyEgswuCsn

HN member
Joined
Thu, May 31, 2018, 1:24 AM UTC
HN karma
616
Public activity
223 items

About RyEgswuCsn

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40906194

    People spent considerable amount of effort developing systems that separate contents from styles (latex, html/css, etc). And with Python people think it’s a good idea to encode con…

  2. comment
    Comment #40680307

    What's your suggestion then? For China to reduce its population by 3/4 (wasn't China heavily criticized for enforcing birth-control?), or to acknowledge that Chinese citizens (or t…

  3. comment
    Comment #40647190

    True browser-centric digital gurus don't restart their computer unless there is a power cut. They also don't shutdown their browser either.

  4. comment
    Comment #40136939

    I think they meant there is only one syllable per character.

  5. comment
    Comment #40136886

    > Japanese has a lot of compound words of Chinese origin, where two or more kanji appear as a set. In the original Chinese language, a "word" mostly consists of a single character.…

  6. comment
    Comment #39957775

    Except that a weather forecasting model can't experiment on weather, but a LLM system may be designed to be able to perform experiments and take feedbacks?

  7. comment
    Comment #39887025

    Excellent, Python is officially my favourite language now!

  8. comment
    Comment #39886840

    How about allowing non-indentation-defined code blocks? Say, by wrapping a block of code with {}?

  9. comment
    Comment #39776260

    It's salami bait and switch.

  10. comment
    Comment #39749431

    This is somewhat expected to be honest. I am rather pessimistic on the future solutions to such issues though. I can see only one possibility going forward: camera sensor manufactu…

  11. comment
    Comment #39699902

    I am afraid there are no such thing as "friends" when it comes to international politics...

  12. comment
    Comment #39693172

    Gangs also offer to "defend" local businesses from other gangs.

  13. comment
    Comment #39684972

    What I meant to say is that most people can only verify an algorithm is correct if they already know the correct solution. If they already know the answer then it’s probably more e…

  14. comment
    Comment #39684412

    If you need AI to help you program an algorithm, then you shouldn't be using it because you can't tell if AI's solution is correct. If you can tell if a solution is correct or not …

  15. comment
    Comment #39671719

    I feel Java deserves better. When Python finally gets true thread concurrency, JIT (mamba and the like), comprehensive static analysis (type hints), and some sophisticated GC, and …

  16. comment
    Comment #39464697

    Or they could mean "used by engineers who work at Google (for their non-work related projects)"?

  17. comment
    Comment #39105877

    > It's fascinating to me that the complexity of life always goes up. I feel this is only the case because the ecosystem keeps receiving useful/low-entropy energy inputs from the Su…

  18. comment
    Comment #38931270

    Just be patient. It takes some time for academic influencers to start jumping on the bandwagon.

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #38918819

    __lack__ evidence sounds like you have already made up you mind but is just searching for confirmation. I'd say a better expression would be "we don't know yet whether ...", e.g.: …

  21. comment
    Comment #38918753

    > claiming "there's no evidence that happened" is nonsense - you just heard the evidence, and any reasonable person would conclude you did. I am not sure about that. If someone cla…

  22. comment
    Comment #38916758

    We are talking about different kind of evidence here. There are two sense entries under the word "evidence" per Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary[1]: 1. the facts, signs or obje…

  23. comment
    Comment #38913540

    That's not how logic works. The equivalent statement is "extraordinary evidence doesn't necessarily imply extraordinary claims".

  24. comment
    Comment #38913461

    I would argue that true evidence (for a claim) can be defined as such piece of information that, when a third party is invited to examine it, they would arrive at the same conclusi…

  25. comment
    Comment #38912090

    I'd say the difference is pretty simple: true evidence needs to be verifiable. Scientific studies provide evidence by describing the experiments/procedures needed to reproduce its …