Viewing profile — RsmFz
RsmFz
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 02, 2024, 5:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 15
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About RsmFz
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41359206
But I never maximize my web browsers, either
-
comment
Comment #41304897
Looks correct now on Firefox on macOS (light mode, probably)
-
comment
Comment #41301115
We have that here at Firezone. To deal with I/O we don't use Tokio inside the test boundary at all, just futures. So no I/O, no sleeping, etc. Thomas explained it here https://fire…
-
comment
Comment #41203930
I think it's LiveView for the frontend-backend comms and Tailwind CSS for some of the frontend, not sure if that answers your question -- (non-web) developer at Firezone
-
comment
Comment #41203901
Well that's also true for Firezone :) It's a tradeoff between in-process and out-of-process though. It's nice that Firezone Gateways don't have access to the service's memory space…
-
comment
Comment #41203884
Ah that's tough because Wireguard being UDP is a selling point for us at Firezone
-
comment
Comment #41193956
Oh so that allows it to run in-process? That's cool, I did that for an HTTP forwarding thing a while back.
-
comment
Comment #41193833
Hm, is Wireguard getting blocked by middleboxes or something?
-
comment
Comment #41181602
I live by but two rules, private keys stay on the storage device they're first saved to, and makeup stays with the first person to use it.
-
comment
Comment #41181596
Firezone employee here. I believe we have an idea to let customers sign their keys so that they don't need to trust our portal not to rewrite keys. This is probably the same idea T…
-
comment
Comment #41173360
> has signed a bill into law that will significantly curb the penalties companies could face for improperly collecting and using fingerprints and other biometric data from workers …
-
comment
Comment #41162612
I think the phrase is "zero-cost abstractions", meaning "Supposing you want bounds checks, you may as well use ours and not roll your own"
-
comment
Comment #41162597
> You can't just write some code and then say it must be secure because Rust was involved Did they say that?
-
comment
Comment #41162580
That'll happen with permissive licenses
-
comment
Comment #41150351
I don't remember any big insights except that I'm pretty bad at estimates. Everything that feels like a "half-day" task took an entire day or two. I would look back on every featur…
-
comment
Comment #41150348
I cranked out a Lua interpreter implemented in Rust in a week or two. It only ran about 3x slower than PUC Lua... And never collected garbage either :P
-
comment
Comment #41147813
Oh I built one of those with Rust and FLTK: https://six-five-six-four.com/git/reactor/annoying_journal I figured if it works for software profiling it oughta work for people. And I…