Viewing profile — RotsiserMho
RotsiserMho
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 26, 2013, 8:46 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 97
- Public activity
- 64 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About RotsiserMho
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25335783
I wonder if they do bin them though, just not for iPhones or iPads. Perhaps today's A13/A14s that have small defects are tomorrow's Apple TV or HomePod CPUs.
-
comment
Comment #23805263
I've had good luck with VMware Fusion.
-
comment
Comment #20774414
I drive a 2013 FRS (older US version of the 86) and I'll experience weird dropouts all day like once every couple of months. Otherwise it works flawlessly. Very strange. You might …
-
comment
Comment #20727872
There's a fascinating write-up by John Carmack in there about porting the original Wolfenstein 3D to the iPhone. Crazy to think that was over 10 years ago. https://github.com/video…
-
comment
Comment #17244475
Terminator does as well.
-
comment
Comment #16730289
I would. Both because it's more idiomatic and because it's inevitable more functions will be added.
-
comment
Comment #16558890
You might be interested in Boost.Outcome (v2) or the proposed std::expected.
-
comment
Comment #16195291
It's called the C++ REST SDK ( https://github.com/Microsoft/cpprestsdk ) now and is fairly active. I've used it client-side and I've really enjoyed it.
-
comment
Comment #15732365
Thanks for taking the time to type this up. Having just written a class similar to Span in C++ I was curious as to how this would be accomplished in C#.
-
comment
Comment #15458106
I'd say for strings it's entirely domain dependent. Many problem domain's won't ever use `std::variant` but may require that all strings live in ROM, so for those domains the defau…
-
comment
Comment #13945630
I've been pretty happy with Qt Creator. It's faster than CLion anyway.
-
comment
Comment #13665010
Anything that hasn't been updated to take into account C++11 is going to do more of a disservice than be of help.
-
comment
Comment #13664988
That's his reference book. It's not designed for systematic learning. It's designed as a reference, as in "cut-and-paste stuff". You want one of his other books, meant to take you …
-
comment
Comment #13008438
This. So much. Declaring intent (what) is much more useful than declaring the mechanics (how). I don't typically care about the "how", just the "what". And the more readable that i…
-
comment
Comment #12953193
Swift?
-
comment
Comment #12893493
I haven't tried either but I've been meaning to take a look at https://github.com/Amanieu/asyncplusplus .
-
comment
Comment #12893401
I'm pretty sure the mobile CPUs support at least 64GB of DDR3. So the memory subsystem would be desktop class but they could use the same mobile CPUs. Seems to me that might have b…
-
comment
Comment #12893308
I think the lack of any news on other products accounts for at least 50% of the backlash. As Apple's product line stands the only products looking forward to a USB/TB3 future are l…
-
comment
Comment #12851740
I develop in C++ and have been happy with a combination of Qt Creator and XCode.
-
comment
Comment #12836849
How does one do this for XCode builds? Especially with the sad state of the Mac Mini.
-
comment
Comment #12688499
That's essentially what the blog post he drafted said: https://kapeli.com/apple_draft
-
comment
Comment #12558581
Probably consistency with C#.
-
comment
Comment #12515558
+1 for documenting intent.
-
comment
Comment #12515552
That's quite the blanket statement. Refactoring is just as much of a problem in statically typechecked languages. I write unit tests for a large C++ codebase and find them incredib…
-
comment
Comment #12515502
I don't think it's a given that breaking it down introduces complexity. I've found that creating a sub-function for the sole purpose of just giving it a name does wonders for makin…