Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Rioghasarig

Rioghasarig

HN member
Joined
Fri, Dec 06, 2019, 8:46 AM UTC
HN karma
78
Public activity
43 items

About Rioghasarig

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44618399

    I really doubt it's like a "solid junior developer". If it could do the work of a solid junior developer it would be making programming projects 10-100x faster because it can do th…

  2. comment
    Comment #34834403

    I think it was deliberate but just as a joke.

  3. comment
    Comment #34007293

    This doesn't seem very helpful at all. First it seems impossibly difficult to execute and probably won't benefit the artists much.

  4. comment
    Comment #34007203

    >Not, if the worker is an engineer or similar. Some engineers built tools that improved building tools Those engineers consented to creating the new tools so that's different

  5. comment
    Comment #33628539

    How is it "technically correct"? It's just plain wrong.

  6. comment
    Comment #33628519

    Clearly pi = 0003.14159...

  7. comment
    Comment #33531752

    > You only see top programmers who started as kids and probably won some Olympiads and programming competitions, and this continued in their 20s and maybe kept their skill up till …

  8. comment
    Comment #33480407

    How in the world is that disingenuous? That's the direct implication.

  9. comment
    Comment #33477416

    > As any generalization this one too is, of course, incorrect. His statement wasn't a generalization to repeating this back does not make sense.

  10. comment
    Comment #33229674

    I mean that's where the term came from, after all.

  11. comment
    Comment #33229424

    I think the description in the article was actually good. In particular, the part where they say: > This is the metaphor used to describe the unpredictability of chaotic systems:ti…

  12. comment
    Comment #33144626

    Doesn't change the fact that it's a bad experiment. Anyone familiar with DALL-E would predict this result. He should have taken some time to understand what DALL-E can do and propo…

  13. comment
    Comment #33142585

    I think it's just a bad experiment. The author must have been truly ignorant about the capabilities and utilities of DALL-E if he thought this experiment would yield interesting re…

  14. comment
    Comment #33142142

    If he didn't deliberately to make DALL-E look bad than he did it out of ignorance of what DALL-E's strengths and weaknesses are. Your evaluation of what is "simple" and what is "mo…

  15. comment
    Comment #33107928

    Well that's what mathematicians like to do.

  16. comment
    Comment #33098078

    My understanding of this situation is that they found a way to multiply 4x4 matrices that requires fewer multiplications than Strassen's . This implies that that can generalize to …

  17. comment
    Comment #33091517

    You don't know that.

  18. comment
    Comment #30211131

    This guy was born to be a Nintendo hacker.

  19. comment
  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #28214073

    I don't see anything wrong with this situation. People who exhibit profit-seeking behavior (entrepreneurs) can make much more money than people don't exhibit profit-seeking behavio…

  22. comment
    Comment #28213827

    > goal post moving You're being silly. The guy is explaining his perspective. He's explaining what he believes and why he believes it. He's not writing a thesis or constructing som…

  23. comment
    Comment #28212955

    Even the smartest people can be wrong and it can take an outside perspective for them to realize this. This isn't an example of someone "fileting" another's argument. It's an examp…

  24. comment
    Comment #28212535

    > His official IQ of 230 remains the highest officially measured IQ in the world. Terrence Tao doesn't have an official IQ. People like to make up numbers for smart people's IQs.

  25. comment
    Comment #28197503

    That's a pretty bold model for human cognition. It's not something you can just assume.