Viewing profile — ReK_
ReK_
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 11:36 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 16
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ReK_
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41924460
Except it's not 16 million containers. You need addressing for every link in the network. Want 10 racks of 20 servers with redundant switching in each, redundant spines in the netw…
-
comment
Comment #41924350
That's only true if you aren't behind CG-NAT. If you are, your firewall can port forward all it wants but it won't matter, the ISP would have to also port forward to you.
-
comment
Comment #41252986
You sure about that? > They also say they can share your personal information with dealers (there are lots of those around for sure), social media platforms, advertising companies,…
-
comment
Comment #40938215
I guess theoretically phishing could be considered MiTM, but the latter term generally implies the attack is fully transparent to the user, whereas phishing convinces the user to i…
-
comment
Comment #40938200
Because banks are financial institutions and every decision they make is based in that. If the cost of insurance is less than the cost to actually secure the system, they will choo…
-
comment
Comment #40890976
Check out trakt.tv
-
comment
Comment #40890828
I wrote something to bulk download my library from Bandcamp and actually packaged it as an excuse to mess with github actions: https://github.com/ReK42/bcamp-dl
-
comment
Comment #38670809
You're thinking of SSH keys, which are not certificates. SSH certificates are indeed x.509: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6187
- story