Viewing profile — Raynos
Raynos
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 21, 2011, 12:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 78
- Public activity
- 35 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Raynos
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39320425
I wrote a static config class that reads configuration for the entire app / server from a JSON or YAML file ( https://github.com/uber/zanzibar/blob/master/runtime/static_... ). Onc…
-
comment
Comment #34492290
I’m moving locations a lot myself too. I’ve found deel / remote is not great because it tethers you to the country you started in. For my situation setting up my own us llc and con…
-
comment
Comment #8065325
In all javascript apps the part that is slow is the DOM, not the javascript interface. This benchmark was taken from the webkit source code then forked into http://vuejs.org/perf/ …
-
comment
Comment #7787109
This seems similar to a module I wrote called [html-delegator][1]. The separation of thing that emits named event and listener is a good idea. I Actually moved away from the HTML a…
-
comment
Comment #7745795
I opened this PR on virtual-dom ( https://github.com/Matt-Esch/virtual-dom/pull/67 ) to get a single file version into the git repo. It has many folders because the `vtree`, `vdom`…
-
comment
Comment #7742802
I've been building a FP style framework very similar to OM & Elm in plain javascript ( https://github.com/Raynos/mercury ). It has some of the core features - immutable data - immu…
-
comment
Comment #7742467
I have a similar frustration with React. The source code is very hard to read our follow. An ideal "barebones" virtual dom library looks like https://github.com/Matt-Esch/virtual-d…
- story
- story
- story
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3983701
"medium" means I don't have personal experience of how the percentage scales to large applications. as for sharing: data sources, domain models, utilities and templates can be shar…
-
comment
Comment #3983476
In a medium sized web application, 50-70% of server-side code can be re-used verbatim between server and client.
-
comment
Comment #3979583
I highly recommend you consider using mocha with the TDD interface rather then nodeunit. [I recently evaluated different node testing libraries]( https://gist.github.com/b0382064a4…
-
comment
Comment #3886804
> Please never, ever write libraries that are shared with other developers. FTFY
-
comment
Comment #3886736
2, 3, 4 should not be done. There is no value in using any of those features. As mentioned, 5 is not a thing. That's spec politics, you shouldn't be doing any of that. As for 1, we…
-
comment
Comment #3842064
Why don't we spend effort on building an ES:Harmony -> ES3 compiler rather then a CoffeeScript -> ES3 compiler. It's more worthwhile future facing project.
-
comment
Comment #3833405
Maybe you should take your opinions about not using client-side code back to 1998
-
comment
Comment #3828175
Agreed, the codebase is a mess. The ideas are nice, the implementation is absolutely horrible.
-
comment
Comment #3265941
the method fails for the exact same reason. If a single method calls a super method and that method calls another super method then it fails. Object.getPrototypeOf(this).method Alw…
-
comment
Comment #3265922
For the record, I didn't write this library because I thought I could do it better. I wrote it because I didn't know about these other utilities / tools.
-
comment
Comment #3265329
Object.getPrototypeOf(Child).constructor.apply(this, arguments); Works, but is even more verbose. However if you use Object.getPrototypeOf on this you fail the recursive problem in…
-
comment
Comment #3265317
What your showing is ES3 OO sugar. The problem I have is that the notion of a constructor function goes against prototypical OO. In prototypical OO we just have objects and objects…
-
comment
Comment #3265192
super is a nightmare to emulate and get "right". It has a bunch of weird edge cases you don't really want to think about. I promote code like var Cat = Object.make(Animal, { constr…