Viewing profile — Rayhem
Rayhem
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Apr 27, 2019, 6:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 450
- Public activity
- 154 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Rayhem
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48845018
Fun fact: the original was only produced in English but the Shrek remix (which is a *BOP*) got translated into every language the movie did.
-
comment
Comment #46876478
The physics prof who gave me my start would always get this kind of fond, nostalgic look in his eye whenever anyone mentioned "the days of punch card programming". So, naturally, I…
-
comment
Comment #45876554
Disclaimer: I'm just an...interested layman, but as far as I know we don't really know. It looks like there's both genetic and environmental components to it; your genes have a big…
-
comment
Comment #45838066
> I came across narcissism. The idea that you’re smarter than everyone else. Comes from a grandiose sense of self importance. This may be the colloquial description of how narcissi…
-
comment
Comment #44917655
While claiming an aversion to being evil. Actions matter more than words.
-
comment
Comment #44762743
Yes, exactly. If you have to update everyone's health (you do) and the updates are pretty much the same (they are), then things don't get any more cache friendly than this.
-
comment
Comment #44758699
Sure. If your monsters have health, then their health is going to need updating pretty much by definition. Option 1 would be to make each entity responsible for updating itself wit…
-
comment
Comment #44746236
If you're really accessing those fields it's overwhelmingly likely that you're accessing the same field for all of your instances. Your access pattern is going to be monsters[0].he…
-
comment
Comment #44745728
> The health of a monster is currently represented by a 4 byte signed integer, meaning that the health can range from -2^31 to 2^31-1 (2^31 ~= 2 million). We can already see that h…
-
comment
Comment #44500750
> Sometimes authors use it without thinking, but removing the passive voice often makes writing shorter and clearer. I don't think mentioning "authors" is absolutely necessary, but…
-
comment
Comment #43694117
In the same vein, I've been keen to try out "What would the world look like if..." and then show that we do or do not observe related phenomena. It seems like the best way to meet …
-
comment
Comment #43625471
Except when LLM providers bury the thing you're obviously looking for under an entire page of sponsored ads (buy Diet Coke™!), then that convenience argument starts to not hold up …
-
comment
Comment #43389584
I had a parallel thought when a loved one was in the hospital. I noticed the nurses were so busy that small requests like an extra blanket were often forgotten entirely. How incred…
-
comment
Comment #41935174
I've come to understand that software has two axes: the problem domain and the software domain. The problem domain is things like your physical model. Your 3d mesh. Financial trans…
-
comment
Comment #41743226
Obligatory callout to Nick Trefethen (et. al.)'s Chebfun[1] which extends this stuff in just about every direction you can think of. 'Chebfuns' are to functions as floats are to ac…
-
comment
Comment #41121728
When it works we call it intuition. When it doesn't we call it superstition. There are all sorts of availability biases at work here; none of which really support the use of intuit…
-
comment
Comment #40987487
A/C is interesting because it has something of a built-in capacity system. "Super" cool the building during times of the day when power is readily available, and that cooling then …
-
comment
Comment #40738289
> "here's what you should have prepared for our 1:1s" Tangentially, I'd like to survey attitudes about this kind of 1:1. I'm of the opinion that my 1:1 with my manager is my time t…
-
comment
Comment #40429014
> If you have a laser, you can print an optical neural network using a consumer 3D printer. I would love to look into this more. Do you have a reference that would give some instru…
-
comment
Comment #40354638
Not necessarily. If self-driving cars "aren't ready" and then you redefine what ready is, you've absolutely got your thumb on the scale of measuring progress.
-
comment
Comment #40051958
I would be very interested in seeing an error comparison of this technique against something like a full-wave PDE or integral equation solver. Demonstrating that the (fast) raytrac…
-
comment
Comment #39766078
Why not simply ask? "Hi $COLLEAGUE. I'm having a problem with $TASK: I'm trying to accomplish $GOAL but I keep seeing $ERROR. I've tried $WORKAROUNDS, but none of them have fixed t…
-
comment
Comment #39456369
This sounds like the next-gen version of Translation Party[1]. The "translation equilibrium" is when you get the same thing on both sides of the translation. I wonder what the "AI …
-
comment
Comment #39375964
> I have no doubt quantum physicists know what they are talking about but...I always think it is the kind of excuse a schoolkid would give their teachers for their calculations bei…
-
comment
Comment #39118970
> A better way to make decisions in a software project is to consult with stakeholders (if necessary), identify the appropriate decision maker based on competence and then let that…