Viewing profile — RawInfoSec
RawInfoSec
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 04, 2015, 5:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 17
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About RawInfoSec
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19204589
It was a hard decision sometimes, (as most boards gave only an hour so other people get a turn). Do I play Tradewars? LORD? What about downloading another half of disk 2 of UFO:Ene…
-
comment
Comment #13501670
Okay there's something not right here. People are reporting that it was too late, however the block post is gone, and I've yet to see an obit posted in any of the locals around her…
-
comment
Comment #11865935
Why guess when you can just sniff the network for the sequence? Port knocking requires the network that you're using to knock is in fact as secure and trusted as the one you're kno…
-
comment
Comment #11862912
Restrict SSH access inbound to trusted networks only. Then you don't have to worry about all this hoopla.
-
comment
Comment #11862766
There's a number of things I disagree with in the article, but it does have a few good points. Here's what I disagree with and why: - Portknocking. I've found from experience that …
-
comment
Comment #11482829
If you can't secure your email, why would you be surprised when your servers dissapop? I understand that there should have been more layers beyond this and all, but really, what is…
-
comment
Comment #11474528
Okay Wordfence CEO. How the hell does your product prevent SQL injection attacks on a payment processor outside of the Wordpress ecosystem??? ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04…
-
comment
Comment #11458145
While this helps *.wordpress.com users or custom domains using the wordpress.com back end, it's going to cause a ruckus with self hosted ones. Neither WordPress or LetsEncrypt has …
-
comment
Comment #11452609
Forgot to mention, the RevSlider exploit used on your demo video will not give full access to the system as you stated. It'll give only access which the web server is currently exe…
-
comment
Comment #11452346
At best, this article is amateur hour for WordFence. It's focused on the topmost layers of the OSI model in an ecosystem requiring attention at all layers, from the wire -> up. Don…
-
comment
Comment #11170939
I think there's actually more web sites being built than ever, and that the problem is that company's expect more for less. The WordPress pollution has brought about a revolution i…
-
comment
Comment #10687047
First thing I do when configuring a mail client. Enforce plain text only.
-
comment
Comment #10546395
Thanks, but you misunderstand my point. Actually you pretty much prove my point that most MTAs are run by those who can't grasp that there are RFC standards out there. An MTA shoul…
-
comment
Comment #10544845
It's email. SMTP. It's not instant messaging and it sure isn't a browser. Point blank, it's easy to see that this is by design and not by quirk or fault. If anything Google are loo…
-
comment
Comment #10470529
Can you post this dialog? I have trouble understanding how they gave a solid "No" on something which warrants much consideration. Most companies won't even respond if they don't in…
-
comment
Comment #10469236
>Note: This information has been disclosed to >Google appropriately, they have chosen to not >fix this behavior. >The other day, my friend sent me a link So did Google respond with…
-
comment
Comment #10457604
Plus lack of identity validation. While the author of the article minimizes this, we shouldn't remove it from the equation just because users can't tell the difference. The right t…
-
comment
Comment #10319400
I can safely say that it's never to limit our own workload. Considering we'd get paid less if we had nothing to do, it would be pretty dumb to work towards that goal. It's to save …
-
comment
Comment #10318340
If you want to get employees to lock their workstations, make it a policy and fire the ones who repeatedly break it. If you have to get their attention via childish pranks it's a w…
-
comment
Comment #10027156
"I have detailed files on human anatomy." - T-800
-
comment
Comment #9876287
Every investment opportunity has risk, and many possible outcomes. There will always be investors who gained. There will always be investors who missed a chance to gain. Alternativ…
-
comment
Comment #9839670
I should also note that no email provider should be trusted for 'important email' as mentioned in the article title. Two reasons. 1) Email is not built with security in mind. Don't…
-
comment
Comment #9839611
I agree with him. False and useless. There's zero evidence to show that, "Gmail not to be trusted with important email.", as the title suggests. None of it is factual. All of it is…
-
comment
Comment #9839449
You're clearly not understanding this. Random checks do belong in a large scale mail system such as GMail. Their system only checks 1 in x emails for DKIM/SPF. Could you imagine ru…
-
comment
Comment #9838917
Enable SPF and DKIM before jumping to uneducated conclusions please. Even if it's randomly accepting for the same address during repeat testing does not indicate that it's not cari…