Viewing profile — RandoHolmes
RandoHolmes
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 12:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 250
- Public activity
- 262 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About RandoHolmes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24464750
This is knowable without a scientific study...
-
comment
Comment #24464738
As I said in my original post, everyone obviously understands that the percentage isn't 0, and understands why. But the idea that homosexual couples have less children than heteros…
-
comment
Comment #24462002
gasp YOU MEAN THE SLAVE OWNER POINTED TO THE CURRENT LAWS TO DEFEND THEIR POSITION!?!??! Well that worked out well in terms of their history, lmao. Please, keep telling me how the …
-
comment
Comment #24461984
Dude, so right that I can't slam that upvote hard enough... I'm just saying, if we can't have exactly a 40 hour work week, and we can't do it exactly for every person alive, then o…
-
comment
Comment #24461968
omg, you're so right! The blogger had to be scouted by the agency, which used agency resources, therefore the blogger is totally liable for that risk!!!!!oneoneoneneoneshiftoneshif…
-
comment
Comment #24461930
No one is saying that current laws aren't bullshit, they obviously are. The point is that that if Uber goes away, it won't stop people from paying for rides. It's a bit like claimi…
-
comment
Comment #24461900
ahahahahahahaha. You mean you can't define free will in those terms!?!?!? Who would have guessed....
-
comment
Comment #24461880
You pulled those numbers out of your ass... The truth is that 99% of the population believes that homosexual couples will have less children then heterosexual... The surprising res…
-
comment
Comment #24461747
I'd like to buy "what is stockholm's syndrome for 500 alex!". https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockholm-syndrome The better question. Are you implying this doesn't exist and the…
-
comment
Comment #24461707
How can we know that eggs are tasty unless a 3rd party tells us! I won't quote the science, I'll simply say that things are knowable outside of a system...
-
comment
Comment #24461305
If I were to engage with you in a serious manner, it would imply that I agree with your view that the only morality is that which is in the constitution. But I fundamentally disagr…
-
comment
Comment #24461252
I would like for you to define 'free will' in such a way that it cannot, in any way, include slavery. And you must do so by not explicitly defining it as 'not slavery'. go.
-
comment
Comment #24460929
It's almost as if defining anything as a "mathematical truth" is definitionally wrong and anyone having done so should be called out as a liar. Only the person who responded to the…
-
comment
Comment #24460915
Thank you, I took the same issue you did when reading this. There are not "truths" in mathematics, it's literally a system of logic with definitions at the bottom (axioms) and then…
-
comment
Comment #24460871
I don't know, anything that implied dogs being raped would have been rejected by me, a layperson who grew up with dogs. Your argument seems to be more about "because some people we…
-
comment
Comment #24460841
Maybe this particular study, but I have to say I believe it in general. I remember working for a manufacturing company where I drove a forklift (during the summer). One of my most …
-
comment
Comment #24460771
I guess slavery is worth having since someone, somewhere, "chose" to do it... Wait, what's that!?!? Are you saying it's acceptable for society to make decisions for those who don't…
-
comment
Comment #24460720
Are you SURE you're not stupid? Fine, maybe you're not stupid, but the alternative is immoral. One of those is under your control the other is not. Which do you want to choose?
-
comment
Comment #24460702
Why would it be unethical to cut out the middle man?? Oh nooo!?!?! How dare I hire that blogger directly, I'll go to jail/be fined for not going through a hiring agency!?!?! You re…
-
comment
Comment #24460649
When you can imagine a slave owner making the same argument ('it invalidates my business model!'), said argument kind of becomes a positive. I mean that seriously. If your business…
-
comment
Comment #24460619
Several in fact! But to take your implication head on, I once worked for a company whose owner decided to do this stuff himself. It resulted in several instances of people going un…
-
comment
Comment #24460602
> it feels like a threat. I'm glad you feel attacked, that was my intent. The next step is to be a better human being. Not all opinion's are morally equivalent, this is easy to see…
-
comment
Comment #24460042
that's the wrong attitude. That would be like a layman hearing someone say "general AI isn't possible, their claims are bollocks" and someone responding with "maybe that's true, bu…
-
comment
Comment #24460002
I just want to say that this is an attitude that's come up over time and as an older person it baffles me. To explain, college curriculum's require atleast 1 public speaking class.…
-
comment
Comment #24459939
> Many people don’t have such abilities, and 95% of the people I know never needed to present something to any audience so they don’t have experience in it either. You act as if th…