Viewing profile — RabbitAngstrom

Following the source -- excellent idea. I bet most of the rest of his class has a similar searchability...

Perhaps the "beer" subtext is just more about being exclusive (beer nerds welcome here) versus inclusive. What if instead the same event was going out to a bar, where you can order…

Anecdotal evidence to be sure, but I went to an Ivy League School (Penn) on just straight-As and 700s (!) on the SATs. I was not a "legacy" student of any kind. I knew many such pe…

IVF doesn't actually change the genetic makeup of the sperm or egg in question. To do so would create a genetically altered human.

Once you are born with synthetic DNA, is it not "existing in nature?" An interesting point, but cloning is not very popular among bioethicists.

Not a patent lawyer, but I would think that 1)the ruling focuses in on retrieval of how DNA is naturally stored, which is more or less the same in all organisms 2)you can replicate…

A co-worker in my lab pointed out that Myriad's stock is actually rising [1] after the decision.The best guess is that Myriad's competitive advantage is shifting to the enormous am…

Interesting point; in the scientific community some are quite honored by being chosen as a peer reviewer. It's like a rite of passage. The only difference I can see is that the You…

Also, I have seen wholly unreviewed material in Nature Precedings, which I can only assume is due to the pressure of being scooped. As you might imagine, non-peer-reviewed scientif…

You got it: when you follow the money, it's clear why this article is happening. Journals have long used free labor for peer review and editing, and rake in the money with subscrip…

This is my first reaction too, but then I must remember that it's free to publish in Nature (and Science, et. al.) because of their massive readership. I don't think they'll go any…