Viewing profile — Quis_sum
Quis_sum
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 22, 2024, 2:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 7 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Quis_sum
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45679145
I am probably too old school: Unless properly documented (the "whats" and especially the "whys") and provided with a test harness (plus the test cases, including all fringe cases b…
-
comment
Comment #43450520
Clearly the author never worked with a CM2 - I did though. The CM2 was more like a co-processor which had to be controlled by a (for that age) rather beefy SUN workstation/server. …
-
comment
Comment #42627687
C definitely does not need this - in fact I would go as far and consider it harmful. I agree that a feature like this could be useful, but then there are other useful features whic…
-
comment
Comment #42494494
C was designed in the 1970s with the goal of giving you minimal overhead, bar using a macro-assembler. The way C handles "strings" provides exactly that. The OP clearly stated that…
-
comment
Comment #42491382
I don't have an issue with the OP's example, which is quite nifty indeed, despite the penalties incurred.
-
comment
Comment #42491222
s is still a pointer to character. This is just an optimised shorthand for (assuming ASCII): char s[3]; Which is then initialised with: 0x48,0x69,0x00 There simply is no such thing…
-
comment
Comment #42486531
Sorry, but there is a significant misunderstanding: There is no such thing as a string in C. What you call a string is a pointer to char (typically "int8") - nothing more nothing l…