Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Quanttek

Quanttek

HN member
Joined
Thu, Sep 04, 2014, 8:01 PM UTC
HN karma
2,962
Public activity
450 items

About Quanttek

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
    Tell HN: EU soliciting feedback on law that could affect Open Access

    The EU Commission currently has an open consultation on the European Research Area Act until 23 January, which might could strengthen rights to open access and secondary publicatio…

  3. comment
    Comment #44135080

    > German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s centre-left coalition agreed to “evaluate” a tax on internet platforms in its treaty signed in early May, agreeing that the proceeds should be …

  4. comment
    Comment #43818526

    Can you specify ? The default heavy reliance on Reddit and YouTube, rather than trusted publications (e.g. Scientific American, NYTimes) and scientific publications, is worrying gi…

  5. comment
    Comment #43608987

    That's exactly my point! Take the train to Zurich, then fly out of there and you'll get both a better experience and emit less carbon

  6. comment
    Comment #43608213

    > My 55-minute flight from Geneva to Zurich didn't land on its first attempt. I know this is not the point of the article but why would you take a flight from Geneva to Zurich? It'…

  7. comment
    Comment #40697560

    The idea is pretty easy: If an employer could simply ask you about past union activity (or activity indicating it, such as certain training) and then fire you for lying about your …

  8. comment
    Comment #39928386

    > Speaking of international laws of combat: no protections apply to non-uniformed combatants pretending to be civilians. None. They can be tortured, executed on the spot, whatever.…

  9. comment
    Comment #39928185

    I did not assert that it would be legally binding. However, it is considered to be quite authoritative by lawyers, including military lawyers. The two most controversial parts conc…

  10. comment
    Comment #39928147

    Exactly! The key difference is that the worker still count as civilians in the calculus that considers whether an attack is proportional (anticipated military advantage vs expected…

  11. comment
    Comment #39928132

    That has nothing to do with your original statement. Yes, hospital can lose their special protection but must then be given a warning that gives them enough time to evacuate and on…

  12. comment
    Comment #39923861

    While the DPH Guidance has it's controversial parts (Rec IX), the guidance on interpreting "directly participating in hostilities" is quite authoritative. And that should be emphas…

  13. comment
    Comment #39923318

    You can target the manufacturing plants since they are military objectives but you cannot target the workers. If any war-sustaining activity would make you, as a person, a target, …

  14. comment
    Comment #39918664

    Years ago, scholars (such as Didier Bigo) have already raised concerns about the targeting of individuals merely based on (indirect) association with a "terrorist" or "criminal". O…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #39370592

    Relevant paras: > (γ) Statutory requirement to decrypt communications > 76. Lastly, as regards the requirement to submit to the security services information necessary to decrypt e…

  17. comment
    Comment #39370572

    Yes, that is very true. The Court generally does not oppose surveillance measures in general, as long as adequate safeguards are in place. However, I read the relevant paragraphs (…

  18. comment
    Comment #39370465

    I think that depends on what you mean: a general state of emergency or a specific situation where the police deem there to be an emergency (e.g. classic hidden bomb scenario) Regar…

  19. comment
    Comment #39370390

    Slightly misleading: The Court's judgments are legally binding upon the State members of the Council of Europe. However, it is true that there is no armed enforcement mechanism – s…

  20. comment
    Comment #39370339

    Click on "details" and you can permalink

  21. comment
    Comment #39370322

    For a better understanding: The Court held (in the circumstances of this case) that a legal obligation to decrypt E2E communications is a disproportionate interference with the rig…

  22. story
  23. story
  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #39068302

    This is fantastic. If companies want to create AI models, they should license the content they use for the training data. As long as there are not sufficient legal protections and …