Viewing profile — Quanttek
Quanttek
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 04, 2014, 8:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,962
- Public activity
- 450 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Quanttek
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
story
Tell HN: EU soliciting feedback on law that could affect Open Access
The EU Commission currently has an open consultation on the European Research Area Act until 23 January, which might could strengthen rights to open access and secondary publicatio…
-
comment
Comment #44135080
> German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s centre-left coalition agreed to “evaluate” a tax on internet platforms in its treaty signed in early May, agreeing that the proceeds should be …
-
comment
Comment #43818526
Can you specify ? The default heavy reliance on Reddit and YouTube, rather than trusted publications (e.g. Scientific American, NYTimes) and scientific publications, is worrying gi…
-
comment
Comment #43608987
That's exactly my point! Take the train to Zurich, then fly out of there and you'll get both a better experience and emit less carbon
-
comment
Comment #43608213
> My 55-minute flight from Geneva to Zurich didn't land on its first attempt. I know this is not the point of the article but why would you take a flight from Geneva to Zurich? It'…
-
comment
Comment #40697560
The idea is pretty easy: If an employer could simply ask you about past union activity (or activity indicating it, such as certain training) and then fire you for lying about your …
-
comment
Comment #39928386
> Speaking of international laws of combat: no protections apply to non-uniformed combatants pretending to be civilians. None. They can be tortured, executed on the spot, whatever.…
-
comment
Comment #39928185
I did not assert that it would be legally binding. However, it is considered to be quite authoritative by lawyers, including military lawyers. The two most controversial parts conc…
-
comment
Comment #39928147
Exactly! The key difference is that the worker still count as civilians in the calculus that considers whether an attack is proportional (anticipated military advantage vs expected…
-
comment
Comment #39928132
That has nothing to do with your original statement. Yes, hospital can lose their special protection but must then be given a warning that gives them enough time to evacuate and on…
-
comment
Comment #39923861
While the DPH Guidance has it's controversial parts (Rec IX), the guidance on interpreting "directly participating in hostilities" is quite authoritative. And that should be emphas…
-
comment
Comment #39923318
You can target the manufacturing plants since they are military objectives but you cannot target the workers. If any war-sustaining activity would make you, as a person, a target, …
-
comment
Comment #39918664
Years ago, scholars (such as Didier Bigo) have already raised concerns about the targeting of individuals merely based on (indirect) association with a "terrorist" or "criminal". O…
- story
-
comment
Comment #39370592
Relevant paras: > (γ) Statutory requirement to decrypt communications > 76. Lastly, as regards the requirement to submit to the security services information necessary to decrypt e…
-
comment
Comment #39370572
Yes, that is very true. The Court generally does not oppose surveillance measures in general, as long as adequate safeguards are in place. However, I read the relevant paragraphs (…
-
comment
Comment #39370465
I think that depends on what you mean: a general state of emergency or a specific situation where the police deem there to be an emergency (e.g. classic hidden bomb scenario) Regar…
-
comment
Comment #39370390
Slightly misleading: The Court's judgments are legally binding upon the State members of the Council of Europe. However, it is true that there is no armed enforcement mechanism – s…
-
comment
Comment #39370339
Click on "details" and you can permalink
-
comment
Comment #39370322
For a better understanding: The Court held (in the circumstances of this case) that a legal obligation to decrypt E2E communications is a disproportionate interference with the rig…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #39068302
This is fantastic. If companies want to create AI models, they should license the content they use for the training data. As long as there are not sufficient legal protections and …