Viewing profile — Q_is_4_Quantum
Q_is_4_Quantum
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 05, 2020, 9:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 59
- Public activity
- 34 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Q_is_4_Quantum
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47448471
Actually you can't compose quantum crypto protocols like you can classical ones - the composed protocol needs a new security analysis. Entanglement across protocols often kills the…
-
comment
Comment #47446012
ChatGPT suggests (and cites your paper): Give the humans an order 1,2,3,…, and let a referee read them in that order. Person k tosses one fair coin and reports H/T. The referee sto…
-
comment
Comment #47445051
Yeah sorry, pretty vague, and I'm not sure what the "rules" precisely should be. Roughly I mean something that involves an infinite number of humans but where the workload per huma…
-
comment
Comment #47444503
Asher Peres told me that Bill Wootters should be given 99% of the credit for the teleportation discovery (and this is in the context that most of us around at the time presumed the…
-
comment
Comment #47360276
Fun read! I have an extremely vague question; Is there one of these "stupid" ways of computing pi that doesn't involve an infeasible (to humans) infinity? I'm comparing to the "hav…
-
comment
Comment #44726993
This was interesting thanks - makes me wish I had the time to study your examples. But of course I don't, without just turning to an LLM.... If for any of these topics you do manag…
-
comment
Comment #44244350
This proposal requires exponential energy! But you can factorize numbers with only one photon (a tiny amount of energy). Oh yeah, you’ll need an exponential number of modes (you ju…
- story
-
comment
Comment #42161945
except the emission spectra from atoms :)
-
comment
Comment #41784423
I suspect you are right - but multiple Nobel prizes have gone to people who got there only very slightly ahead of others in the race. Would be tough to argue that there are many pr…
-
comment
Comment #41784278
Surely Wofram deserves the Nobel as much as Hopfield and Hinton? Not for this stuff of course (which I doubt many take seriously), but because he also provided us with an amazing c…
-
comment
Comment #41784253
It is possible to make quantitative statements that I think capture many of the intuitions you assert. Here was one attempt: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLe…
-
comment
Comment #40977824
Time to move to London, will save yourself a fortune :)
-
comment
Comment #40968734
Is this known to be true? Its obviously not true for arbitrary irrational numbers
-
comment
Comment #40790143
Random question from a very-much-not-computer savvy person on the off chance someone cares to answer: If a tiny charge was levied every time a webserver delivered a page to me woul…
-
comment
Comment #38253765
>I really wish textbooks with open licenses would take over and they could be reworked and improved year after year by different people Could anyone explain to me how they think th…
-
comment
Comment #37837752
Given access to repeated uses of a coin of unknown bias "p" (which is not 0 or 1) you can (eventually) always generate a new coin flip with bias given (exactly) by: 1. 1/2 (i.e fai…
-
comment
Comment #37836133
Perhaps it helps to imagine someone had a "screwy thumb" and the coin only precesses when they "flip" it (in fact people can train themselves to do this, and its very difficult for…
-
comment
Comment #36991280
Unfortunately I don't have a github account, but in case you will take a report from here. In this paper of mine: https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2303.05514 The references come i…
-
comment
Comment #36966255
Its a great start! It seems to be using the bibtex tags for the inline citations. They don't stand out clearly enough for my liking, and they also have me worried: have I ever used…
-
comment
Comment #35138120
Perhaps I would quit if things deteriorated to the point I was seriously considered the best option for such!
-
comment
Comment #33187272
Presumably talking to the wind here as this thread is old, but nonlocal hidden variables do not break causality! This can be seen explicitly in Bell's trivial model, where the stat…
-
comment
Comment #30059411
Can't resist mentioning my personal favorite expansion of a sqrt: sqrt(1-x) = 1- \sum_n C(n)/2^(2n+1) x^(n+1) where x is in (0,1) and C(n)=binomial(2n,n)/(n+1) is the n'th catalan …
-
comment
Comment #26485201
Great - yet another misaligned incentive to throw into the often stressful mix of how lead authorship should be determined!
-
comment
Comment #26154452
Agree with this - the jury is still out on "reality" or otherwise of a wavefunction, and people expend their "real" research efforts differently according to their opinion! Saying …