Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Q_is_4_Quantum

Q_is_4_Quantum

HN member
Joined
Sun, Apr 05, 2020, 9:05 PM UTC
HN karma
59
Public activity
34 items

About Q_is_4_Quantum

qisforquantum.org

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47448471

    Actually you can't compose quantum crypto protocols like you can classical ones - the composed protocol needs a new security analysis. Entanglement across protocols often kills the…

  2. comment
    Comment #47446012

    ChatGPT suggests (and cites your paper): Give the humans an order 1,2,3,…, and let a referee read them in that order. Person k tosses one fair coin and reports H/T. The referee sto…

  3. comment
    Comment #47445051

    Yeah sorry, pretty vague, and I'm not sure what the "rules" precisely should be. Roughly I mean something that involves an infinite number of humans but where the workload per huma…

  4. comment
    Comment #47444503

    Asher Peres told me that Bill Wootters should be given 99% of the credit for the teleportation discovery (and this is in the context that most of us around at the time presumed the…

  5. comment
    Comment #47360276

    Fun read! I have an extremely vague question; Is there one of these "stupid" ways of computing pi that doesn't involve an infeasible (to humans) infinity? I'm comparing to the "hav…

  6. comment
    Comment #44726993

    This was interesting thanks - makes me wish I had the time to study your examples. But of course I don't, without just turning to an LLM.... If for any of these topics you do manag…

  7. comment
    Comment #44244350

    This proposal requires exponential energy! But you can factorize numbers with only one photon (a tiny amount of energy). Oh yeah, you’ll need an exponential number of modes (you ju…

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #42161945

    except the emission spectra from atoms :)

  10. comment
    Comment #41784423

    I suspect you are right - but multiple Nobel prizes have gone to people who got there only very slightly ahead of others in the race. Would be tough to argue that there are many pr…

  11. comment
    Comment #41784278

    Surely Wofram deserves the Nobel as much as Hopfield and Hinton? Not for this stuff of course (which I doubt many take seriously), but because he also provided us with an amazing c…

  12. comment
    Comment #41784253

    It is possible to make quantitative statements that I think capture many of the intuitions you assert. Here was one attempt: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLe…

  13. comment
    Comment #40977824

    Time to move to London, will save yourself a fortune :)

  14. comment
    Comment #40968734

    Is this known to be true? Its obviously not true for arbitrary irrational numbers

  15. comment
    Comment #40790143

    Random question from a very-much-not-computer savvy person on the off chance someone cares to answer: If a tiny charge was levied every time a webserver delivered a page to me woul…

  16. comment
    Comment #38253765

    >I really wish textbooks with open licenses would take over and they could be reworked and improved year after year by different people Could anyone explain to me how they think th…

  17. comment
    Comment #37837752

    Given access to repeated uses of a coin of unknown bias "p" (which is not 0 or 1) you can (eventually) always generate a new coin flip with bias given (exactly) by: 1. 1/2 (i.e fai…

  18. comment
    Comment #37836133

    Perhaps it helps to imagine someone had a "screwy thumb" and the coin only precesses when they "flip" it (in fact people can train themselves to do this, and its very difficult for…

  19. comment
    Comment #36991280

    Unfortunately I don't have a github account, but in case you will take a report from here. In this paper of mine: https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2303.05514 The references come i…

  20. comment
    Comment #36966255

    Its a great start! It seems to be using the bibtex tags for the inline citations. They don't stand out clearly enough for my liking, and they also have me worried: have I ever used…

  21. comment
    Comment #35138120

    Perhaps I would quit if things deteriorated to the point I was seriously considered the best option for such!

  22. comment
    Comment #33187272

    Presumably talking to the wind here as this thread is old, but nonlocal hidden variables do not break causality! This can be seen explicitly in Bell's trivial model, where the stat…

  23. comment
    Comment #30059411

    Can't resist mentioning my personal favorite expansion of a sqrt: sqrt(1-x) = 1- \sum_n C(n)/2^(2n+1) x^(n+1) where x is in (0,1) and C(n)=binomial(2n,n)/(n+1) is the n'th catalan …

  24. comment
    Comment #26485201

    Great - yet another misaligned incentive to throw into the often stressful mix of how lead authorship should be determined!

  25. comment
    Comment #26154452

    Agree with this - the jury is still out on "reality" or otherwise of a wavefunction, and people expend their "real" research efforts differently according to their opinion! Saying …