Viewing profile — PurpleBoxDragon
PurpleBoxDragon
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 8:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,103
- Public activity
- 413 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About PurpleBoxDragon
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19233308
Given the gambling example, should we be mad at the advertisers or at the forum for making money off of allowing such ads? If the Gambling Association made a bunch of posters about…
-
comment
Comment #19218296
A sane system would consider the knowledge and power differences between the average individual and the corporate lawyers who wrote the agreement, along with the one sided nature o…
-
comment
Comment #19218173
> may then pass discriminatory laws for which the Bill of Rights no longer applies against. Cannot they already do this to some limited extent (and perhaps are even required to do …
-
comment
Comment #19173730
>which makes them look very different from normal traffic which kind of by necessity makes them look a lot more like bots. But if they are doing so because they are disabled, and t…
-
comment
Comment #19162293
What about the deafblind?
-
comment
Comment #19155986
>Blame the laws, not the company. Why not both? If I move to a country that legally allows me to do something horrible, people will rightfully call me a bad person regardless of th…
-
comment
Comment #19155669
>the answer from the dev team is almost always, "Works as designed". When I say 'works as designed', what I'm actually saying is that I didn't have control over the design, go talk…
-
comment
Comment #19147606
>There are cases that I'm all for bashing Google when they don't give the company they're targeting enough time to patch something While I understand the common ethos of our curren…
-
comment
Comment #19146788
In C# var is always a place holder for the actual type which the compiler only accepts if it can figure out the type. If you do anything to the var that you can't do to the actual …
-
comment
Comment #19143648
And they do. But what exactly is that line. Prurient content that empowers people? Banned. Content that literally allows control over non-consenting individuals based on their gend…
-
comment
Comment #19143606
>If we enforce some morals and not others in our app stores, who exactly do we choose as the arbiters of morality? Apple and Google are, and their moral guideline is money. They ar…
-
comment
Comment #19138990
> They’ve been exempt / free from responsibility for far too long. I've seen arguments that the government not allowing these debts to be discharged through bankruptcy was a major …
-
comment
Comment #19135768
Is it that they are helping insufficiently, or that they are using this as a strategy for making money and showing their true colors by engaging in it only to the extent they make …
-
comment
Comment #19107267
Getting research subjects is hard. For any significant sort of test beyond a simple survey, it is really really hard. So colleges force their undergrads to be participants so that …
-
comment
Comment #19097896
>Over a reasonable horizon, you weren't profitable. The average worker isn't allowed to do that even when they lose money in a given year. Why is it so naturally assumed to be acce…
-
comment
Comment #19095800
>It is likely easy to pronounce in that person's culture, just not for you. Often names will live on long after the family has left the culture. In my own case, my original family …
-
comment
Comment #19079537
I think it would have to be a requirement of any money the government spends on code. Otherwise, they will easily defeat the requirement to make it public by passing it through a p…
-
comment
Comment #19079520
By hiding the code, it makes security through obscurity far more possible. If you force the code to be public, very poor security will be discovered far faster and be more of an is…
-
comment
Comment #19055246
>Nobody, or very nearly nobody, lives up to their "true potential". I agree. But how do we discuss reasons that are or aren't justified to be taken into account. For example you ca…
-
comment
Comment #19054933
>A huge part of science as a field is consensus. How many were against Einstein for decades? Appeal to consensus among experts is still a fallacy.
-
comment
Comment #19054893
Could one say that meritocracy is not meritocracy? No matter what skill you measure, a population with adequate nutrition since conception is going to be far better than a populati…
-
comment
Comment #19053867
>This is not denying the bad behavior of intelligence agencies in the past. But to say it is okay for someone to work for those agencies is to deny their bad behavior in the past. …
-
comment
Comment #19039923
I think the legality and the morality of free speech aren't connected. You can have legal but immoral speech and illegal but moral speech (such as the example you give). It is poss…
-
comment
Comment #19039899
>Whom is a representative democracy supposed to represent - only educated, upper-class, "quality" folks? I think there is an valid question to what extent should people and views b…
-
comment
Comment #19034802
>legal and morally right I guess the first question is, if I do something illegal, but either avoid being captured or manage to otherwise avoid prosecution by using money or influe…