Viewing profile — Puer
Puer
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 30, 2012, 6:49 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,231
- Public activity
- 175 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Puer
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19042801
I wonder what the NYT will write about when FB and Trump finally stop being newsworthy?
-
comment
Comment #19022796
Ah yes, more unsubstantiated claims about Chinese tech and culture on HN. Can you back up a single thing you've claimed?
-
comment
Comment #18975505
In an alternate universe where Apple produces babies, they'll eventually become so thin they'll snap and bend if you look at them funny.
-
comment
Comment #18963626
My office replaced our 2015 Macbook's with the "latest and greatest." I hate sitting next to my coworkers who use them now. They're good typists and prior to the switch I didn't ev…
-
comment
Comment #18962048
The NYT editorial board seems to have a personal vendetta against FB/Amazon in particular. Twitter and Google get passes in mainstream media, for whatever reason. I wish they would…
-
comment
Comment #18846323
The vast majority of Americans don't know/care what the active ingredient in Tylenol is because its effects have been extensively studied and tested and there's strong evidence con…
-
comment
Comment #18846250
This is the Nirvana fallacy. You aren't addressing the main point of the article, which is even if marijuana is legalized its use perhaps shouldn't be widely promoted because its h…
-
comment
Comment #18842648
I wish the NYT gave Equifax half the scrutiny they give FB.
-
comment
Comment #18811425
Anecdotal, but I am not a heavy phone user at all. Within a year of purchasing my brand new iPhone SE, the battery capacity dropped from 100% to 82%, causing it to begin to lag con…
-
comment
Comment #18792393
Not that there's anything wrong with reporting on the same topic by multiple publications, but this article just seems like a poor copy of this WSJ article published in August: htt…
-
comment
Comment #18766798
You're right, but the aforementioned "12/13" years ago was only 2006. I don't think many significant changes have been made in that period, but I may be wrong.
-
comment
Comment #18766139
I would also be interested in this. Many soft drink recipes are well-established and rarely adjusted because even small, well-intentioned changes can damage the brand and customer …
-
comment
Comment #18766015
That sounds like poor parenting more than anything else. Also, the "sugar -> hyperactive ADHD kids!" thing is a myth.
-
comment
Comment #18734848
My greatest accomplishment as a kid was beating BG2 on "Insane" difficulty as a solo character. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa8JV3z-Oeo I must have played through the game at l…
-
comment
Comment #18731622
Nice resource, thank you for sharing. It's been a why since I've used Ocaml but this will be a good opportunity to review.
-
comment
Comment #18731556
Elements of Programming Interviews in Python is excellent imo. The authors give a crash course in all of the data structures and all of the code is written extremely cleanly. Most …
-
comment
Comment #18725885
The author's thesis is fundamentally flawed. They say it isn't clear why everyone was so excited to have a Facebook, but that's exactly the answer - because everyone had a Facebook…
-
comment
Comment #18721974
I said this this morning and I'll say it again: There's a lot of indefensible stuff Facebook has done in the past 5-10 years that they rightly deserve to be criticized and called o…
-
comment
Comment #18716682
Well in the latter the user specifically gives permission to Spotify when they choose to connect their FB account to Spotify's desktop app. NYT's wording makes it sound like they h…
-
comment
Comment #18716349
I apologize if my argument wasn't clear enough. My issue isn't that they aren't being factually incorrect, it's that they're seemingly using "facts" to be misleading. Example: Sayi…
-
comment
Comment #18716104
News organizations as established as NYT understand the weight of their words because every single one is scrutinized by a board of editors. "Facebook also allowed Spotify, Netflix…
-
comment
Comment #18715688
They needed those permissions to allow for sending/receiving of payments over Messenger. NYT is being intentionally misleading with what "permissions" mean here.
-
comment
Comment #18715648
1) This is just a duplicate of the NYT article already on the front page 2) NYT seems to intentionally not elaborating on the "access to users' private messages" part and conflatin…
-
comment
Comment #18715583
Facebook isn't tapping your phones microphone 24/7. It's a nice little dystopian theory that's been disproven time and again. A far more probable and less exciting explanation is t…
-
comment
Comment #18713620
They'll go right in the same comfy cell as the Equifax execs. Oh wait...