Viewing profile — PuddleCheese
PuddleCheese
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 01, 2022, 6:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 33
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About PuddleCheese
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33458020
These models can actually output images that can be extremely close to the material present in training models: - https://i.imgur.com/VikPFDT.png I also don't know if I would anthr…
-
comment
Comment #33431233
I feel there's a lot missing from this, and some terminology would require clarification (What constitutes "used"?). Generally speaking, this supposition skirts around the concept …
-
comment
Comment #33431102
Because someone may see a version of reality where people are incapable of benefiting from their own work does not mean that it's by any means a settled issue or indicative of "Rea…
-
comment
Comment #33430970
Right. I doubt many people would disagree copyright REFORM is sorely lacking. Or are you suggesting that an artist is not allowed to benefit from their work because Disney has exte…
-
comment
Comment #33429611
If the artist is posting personal work, then it is covered by copyright automatically per the Berne Convention. Copyright exists to incentivize authors, artists, scientists, etc. t…
-
comment
Comment #33429600
Copyright exists to incentivize authors, artists, scientists, etc. to create original works by providing a temporary monopoly. The arguments suggesting that people shouldn't benefi…
-
comment
Comment #33427891
Good points. I was actually just sitting in a AI Town Hall hosted by the Concept Art Association which had 2 US Copyright Lawyers who work at the USCO present, and their along simi…
-
comment
Comment #33427733
1. I like this style of work. I cannot make this style of work. I will pay this artist to produce this style of work. 2. I like this style of work. I cannot make this style of work…
-
comment
Comment #33427684
I mean, the alternative is arguably that artists become indentured servants to scraping/training models that benefit the people who are doing the scraping/training, at the arguable…
-
comment
Comment #33425587
Just because it's here doesn't mean it can't be modified going forward, and that we have to surrender to any and all ability to regulate anything. Fatalism can be attractive if you…
-
comment
Comment #33425576
Let's not conflate ethical inputs for full-out "undo" panic. I don't see many people saying that we need to "un-release" anything. What I do see is a want for ethical consideration…
-
comment
Comment #33425414
The brain-computer metaphor is not a very good one, it's a pretty baseless appeal. Additionally, it's an argument that anthropomorphizes something which has no moral, legal, or eth…
-
comment
Comment #33425251
Artists don't generally try to OWN styles or prevent others from using them. They are the result of years of training, adapting, etc. They put their own spin on it. It's effectivel…
-
comment
Comment #33425022
Re. Point 2: Artists are granted copyright for their work by default per the Berne Convention. These copyrighted works are then used without consent of the original author for thes…