Viewing profile — PollardsRho
PollardsRho
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 1:17 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 60
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About PollardsRho
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47095085
What about bets without insider participation, where you want the market to function as an aggregator of educated guesses? OP has one reaction to insider trading, but I imagine a v…
-
comment
Comment #47091684
A lot of expressions in English started out as calques, outputs that process: you're paving the way!
-
comment
Comment #47006409
All models are wrong; some are useful. Cognizance of that is even more critical for a model like exponential growth that often leads to extremely poor predictions quickly if uncrit…
-
comment
Comment #47006102
> Given consistent trends of exponential performance improvements over many years and across many industries, it would be extremely surprising if these improvements suddenly stoppe…
-
comment
Comment #44426328
Students shouldn't be treating class material as something they "do not care to know." AI can be used in ways that lead to deeper understanding. If a student wants AI to give them …
-
comment
Comment #44341631
If you have many metrics that could possibly be construed as "this was what we were trying to improve", that's many different possibilities for random variation to give you a false…
-
comment
Comment #44276982
Advantage, sure. I just don't think that advantage is particularly meaningful in situations a human has virtually no chance of escaping. Humans also have a lot of their own advanta…
-
comment
Comment #44274590
If someone who is so good at manipulation their life is adapted into a movie still ends up serving decades behind bars, isn't that actually a pretty good indication that maxing out…
-
comment
Comment #44274548
I don't think there's a confident upper bound. I just don't see why it's self-evident that the upper bound is beyond anything we've ever seen in human history.
-
comment
Comment #44274539
People are hurt by animals all the time: do you think having a higher IQ than a grizzly bear means you have nothing to fear from one? I certainly think it's possible to imagine tha…
-
comment
Comment #44273133
Why is 2) "self-evident"? Do you think it's a given that, in any situation, there's something you could say that would manipulate humans to get what you want? If you were smart eno…
-
comment
Comment #43740182
Thanks for sharing this proof! As someone who enjoys math but never got myself through enough Galois theory to finish the standard proof, it's fantastic to see a proof that's more …
-
comment
Comment #43659214
At that point, you'd be better off just using a recursive algorithm like the one in GMP. You're swapping out arbitrary-length for arbitrary-precision.
-
comment
Comment #43659182
The compound-interest intro to e (the value of 1 dollar compounded continuously for a year at 100% interest), to me, has several useful advantages over different introductions that…
-
comment
Comment #43655153
I will die on the hill that TOML should be used for the vast majority of what YAML's used for today. There are times a full language is needed, but I've seen so many YAML files tha…
-
comment
Comment #43625380
They then say there's an approximation for Fibonacci, which makes me think that's what they're calling Binet's formula. (I'd also expect an author with this mathematical sophistica…
-
comment
Comment #43625358
I don't think it's controversial to say that asymptotic analysis has flaws: the conclusions you draw from it only hold in the limit of larger inputs, and sometims "larger" means "l…
-
comment
Comment #43625111
Very cool! What's meant by "it’s already too much to ask for a closed form for fibonacci numbers"? Binet's formula is usually called a closed form in my experience. Is "closed form…
-
comment
Comment #43573245
It seems to me that much of recent AI progress has not changed the fundamental scaling principles underlying the tech. Reasoning models are more effective, but at the cost of more …
-
comment
Comment #43465788
It's not that technical work is guaranteed to be in your codebase 10 years from now, it's that customers don't want to use a product that might be good six months from now. The act…
-
comment
Comment #43465769
Previous experience isn't manual edge cases, it's training data. Humans have incredible scale (100 trillion synapses): we're incredibly good at generalizing, e.g., how to pick up o…
-
comment
Comment #43455717
The time span on which these developments take place matter a lot for whether the bitter lesson is relevant to a particular AI deployment. The best AI models of the future will not…
-
comment
Comment #43001729
> The models keep getting better at an exponential. Isn't it the opposite? Marginal improvements require exponentially more investment, if we believe Altman. AI is expanding into d…
-
comment
Comment #42967879
The math underpinning an AI model exists independent of the hardware it's realized on. I can train a model on one GPU and someone else can replicate my results with a different GPU…
-
comment
Comment #42894986
What incentives do any humans have to so totally delegate the functioning of the core levers of societal power that they're unable to prevent their own extinction? "Better machine …