Viewing profile — PolLambert
PolLambert
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 03, 2015, 9:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 30
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About PolLambert
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #13104859
New nuclear power plants are designed to be safe even when run by unsensible humans (up to 72h) Any nuclear storage has to designed to be safe and secure from the second you close …
-
comment
Comment #10587553
No. Our space-time is definately NOT Anti de Sitter (AdS). AdS/CFT is nothing more than very nice mathematics with applications in different fields of physics. It's not applicable …
-
comment
Comment #10587536
In order to help people think about curvature and gravity, look at the following examples: - The surface of the earth is a 2 dimensional positive curved space. To see this, draw a …
-
comment
Comment #10505211
While I strongly disagree with you on nuclear power (especially since radioactive decay means that 'eternity' by definition is always safe, unlike chemical waste), I strongly agree…
-
comment
Comment #10505179
Load-following is both license and technical related in a chicken-and-egg-way. You need to incorporate load-following into your reactor design. More specifically: the speed with wh…
-
comment
Comment #10505158
A nuclear power plant has thousands of tons of shielding. There are also no timing critical electronics sitting right next to the fuel.
-
comment
Comment #10503192
Since regulations don't allow any other option e.g. the US doesn't allow reprocessing. Also: what better place to temporarily store nuclear waste in the exact same place where it i…
-
comment
Comment #10503163
Not great points: 1. Isn't a business POV or about deadends and it applies to any shift in energy production. 2. I think some geologists are going to want to have a word with him c…
-
comment
Comment #10502994
Which is why you bury it.
-
comment
Comment #10502836
Being very familiar with nuclear waste, I can say that, from a technical pov, it's a solved problem: just put it deep enough to comply with whatever safety level is required. The p…
-
comment
Comment #10502756
The reverse is actually true. Nobody uses Thorium since you can't make bombs out of them. Thorium is very unsuited to weaponize since one of the byproducts of the fuel process (U-2…