Viewing profile — Peter0x44
Peter0x44
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 11:21 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8
- Public activity
- 5 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Peter0x44
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39931649
I've found it to have quite poor defaults for its analysis (things like suggesting "use annex k strcpy_s instead of strcpy"). fanalyzer is still by far the easiest to configure.
-
comment
Comment #39402523
I think their BC is overrated. Wine manages to do a better job.
-
comment
Comment #39184118
Why would I ever have a debug build without sanitizers? Nothing stops you from removing the asserts in this case, anyway. I don't see what the problem is with using __builtin_unrea…
-
comment
Comment #39175262
Asserts are to make your code more sensitive to defects, for example, checking function invariants. Ideally the library has more , not less, since they show care and thought has go…
-
comment
Comment #39175102
Probably it should be stated explicitly, but this is implied if you add `-fsanitize=undefined`, where you will get a diagnostic if the unreachable code is reached. With `-fsanitize…