Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ParadigmComplex

ParadigmComplex

HN member
Joined
Sun, Aug 05, 2012, 11:05 AM UTC
HN karma
144
Public activity
55 items

About ParadigmComplex

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47307562

    A Bedrock Linux 0.7.x point update released less than two months ago. The slow of progress to 0.8.0 is in part because, after 0.7.0's release, the user support load has been very h…

  2. comment
    Comment #36020882

    To be clear, Bedrock Linux does not hang during sleep. Rather, it cannot enter sleep consistently; if it fails to, it simply continues on as it was operating before the request to …

  3. comment
    Comment #34583495

    I've looked into this further since the link you've provided. I have medium/long term ideas to work around this, but nothing in the short term: - Ultimately this seems to trace bac…

  4. comment
    Comment #34583318

    I can speak authoritatively for Bedrock Linux, although blendOS is new to me. From what I can tell reading about blendOS, key differences seem to be: - blendOS appears to use a com…

  5. comment
    Comment #26000280

    Ah, I now see what you mean. With the exceptions of /var/lib/dbus/machine-id and /var/run, which need to be shared for certain bits of software to communicate properly, /var is cur…

  6. comment
    Comment #25993718

    Without something to constrain where it is used, chroot can be theoretically abused as part of an attack. Thus, by default chroot requires root permissions. Part of what schroot do…

  7. comment
    Comment #25992925

    I really do wish I could help, but I don't know how to reconcile what I'm reading as a mutually exclusive desire. If I'm interpreting you correctly, it sounds like you recognize wh…

  8. comment
    Comment #25990968

    Bedrock Linux is a system to integrate things from different distros. The desire to use it while avoiding integration with a "base system" seems mutually exclusive to me. I think o…

  9. comment
    Comment #25990485

    Apologies, I misinterpreted your concern to be a matter of losing the entirety of Nix's atomic features entirely rather than concern over even limited escapes from its Nix's scope.…

  10. comment
    Comment #25990374

    I'm likely equipped to answer your question if you elaborate a bit on what you mean by runtime state. Could you provide concrete examples of things you are curious about? The gener…

  11. comment
    Comment #25990150

    Bedrock does support exactly this workflow. I do something along these lines, with the nuanced difference that I have a period of overlap where I'm using both the old and new strat…

  12. comment
    Comment #25989965

    It depends on exactly what you mean. While you may not have intended it to be, this question is more philosophical than technical. Extended conversations I've had on this topic eve…

  13. comment
    Comment #25989678

    > Thanks for coming on here. You're welcome :) > What do you think about Nix and Guix way of managing packages I have not used either in adequate depth to make strong statements ab…

  14. comment
    Comment #25989301

    You are very welcome

  15. comment
    Comment #25989271

    > What are the main downsides to using Bedrock? I address them in this FAQ entry [0]. In my experience providing support for Bedrock Linux users for over a decade, the most notable…

  16. comment
    Comment #25989157

    My understanding of Bedrock Linux's security concerns are addressed in this FAQ entry [0]. In the decade or so I've been working on Bedrock, I have yet to come across any situation…

  17. comment
    Comment #25989033

    > You mentioned both Arch and AUR in the target user part, which makes me wonder if you were mainly a Arch user before, Before Bedrock Linux I was mainly a Debian user. I did brief…

  18. comment
    Comment #25988817

    > Hi and thanks for reaching out to the community here. You're welcome :) > As a poweruser. What are the benefits of this best of all worlds approach, and when might I need them? I…

  19. comment
    Comment #25988432

    It is not clear to me why you feel this way. Everyone I've spoken with who has put effort toward making Bedrock play nicely NixOS has done so with the aim of retaining that list of…

  20. comment
    Comment #25988318

    > For a more extreme case, there is a schroot (or a docker container) with /home, audio and X mapped in. Works surprisingly well for desktop apps, like those embedded IDEs which re…

  21. comment
    Comment #25985214

    Either stubbornness or perseverance, depending on how charitable one is feeling.

  22. comment
    Comment #25985095

    I'm the Bedrock Linux founder and lead developer. I'm happy to answer any questions.

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #25984965

    > It's pretty cool that this can host other distros, but is that the only advantage over NixOS? The ability to transparently get features from other distros is Bedrock Linux's defi…

  25. comment
    Comment #25003976

    Bedrock Linux does indeed support workflows with multiple copies of Debian, and this does in practice often resolve the quoted concern of mixing parts from different Debian release…