Viewing profile — PM_Tech
PM_Tech
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 04, 2014, 7:24 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -16
- Public activity
- 74 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About PM_Tech
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8027042
Sure...apart from that is not true. They had never been warned and the coffee was not particularly hotter than their rivals at all. They had settled previously but that is not rele…
-
comment
Comment #8027041
You have been voted down but what they have failed to add is the following - Mcdonalds have not changed the temperature of their coffee and the legal precedence has not been replic…
-
comment
Comment #8026867
The article fails to realise that in most of the anecdotes retold; today the state would intervene at the behest of a neighbour and "I read it in the New York Times" will not reall…
-
comment
Comment #8026860
Did she think it was ice-coffee? Had she ordered an ice-frappe and been delivered hot coffee which is typically made with freshly boiled water?
-
comment
Comment #8026857
Is your argument that certain crimes are not crimes in your eyes? You must see how that is completely incompatible with any functioning society. You have decided arbitrarily, in op…
-
comment
Comment #8026846
Let's not. If you are incapable of understanding why your comment is flawed then we are going nowhere. How about you explain which parts of your comment were intelligent?
-
comment
Comment #8026844
The basis of the components do not matter. We make judgements on the whole. In the UK a shotgun is simply a series of tubes with some minor metallic parts. Does not mean because tu…
-
comment
Comment #8024801
It's not a big stretch. It's not a stretch at all. It is valid case law. The end.
-
comment
Comment #8024796
It's not crude. The comment was stupid. It was ill informed, blunt and a complete lack of understanding. I don't need a source to prove it. The comment speaks for itself.
-
comment
Comment #8024793
"You need to Google your way to success" I suppose that says it all! What a brilliant demonstration of exactly why you should be ignored. Keep up the good work, you are a fine exam…
-
comment
Comment #8024649
Nope it's a piracy debate. Zero Freedom of Speech applicability. FoS is also not absolute.
-
comment
Comment #8024273
It's not a slippery slope at all. It's quite clear cut. If a shop was distributing fenced goods or human traffic we wouldn't allow it to remain in business because they also distri…
-
comment
Comment #8024265
Is that your problem? The movie industry makes more than you? That does not sound like juvenile logic at all. Keep up the good work stealing other people's efforts.
-
comment
Comment #8024257
Yes. Unless you think someone should be allowed to post videos of themselves breaking into your house and raping your family? A crime is a crime. That's it. If you don't like copyr…
-
comment
Comment #8024252
Just PasteBin it and inform HN. But you won't because you don't have the balls.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #8023967
^^ This is exactly why you are supremely unqualified to understand or debate the issue. Honestly. Your comment was simply stupid. The takedown request was not because the screensho…
-
comment
Comment #8023960
It is common sense that pedestrians should stay out of streets. And for many years in the UK the pedestrian had the right of way; right up until a Judge was smart enough to realise…
-
comment
Comment #8023949
Actually it shouldn't. It has been proven that the only use of Popcorn Time is to facilitate copyright infringement. It is designed explicitly for that use. Hence banned. Mainly be…
-
comment
Comment #8023943
I absolutely love that the majority of this thread are claiming all sorts of legal protections for Popcorn Time - all the way from free speech to ludicrous comparisons with screens…
-
comment
Comment #8023936
Apart from the fact of being completely substantiated of course. But hey, don't let actual facts get in the way of your opinion.
-
comment
Comment #8022047
Voting you back up for being correct. Why I am not surprised the juveniles here voted you down [eyeroll].
-
comment
Comment #8022046
Seriously, listen to yourself. Here is a little fact; you are not that clever and the rest of the world is not that stupid. Save your strawman arguments. If movies are released by …
-
comment
Comment #8022038
By censorship, you mean facilitate crime and remove money from people who generate content? Feel free to send me all of the proprietary data at your workplace since you care nothin…
-
comment
Comment #8022031
You are if the video player finds copyright DVDs and then delivers them to your door without the permission of the content creator. So yes. Stop being absurd.