Viewing profile — PIKAL

A very substantive comment.

How is it possible for any intellectually honest person to downvote a piece of raw, unedited and candid video footage? How?

Raw video footage doesn’t have an agenda. You have clearly decided for yourself what the footage means to you. Good for you.

In what context should billionaire media moguls be serving, colluding or collaborating with politicians of any kind, let alone a presidential candidate?

And you would say the same thing if the same footage came out but it was Bill O Reilly, Rupert Murdoch and George Bush instead of Clinton, King and Turner?

Decades ago, the news networks used to beam AV via satellite directly from the remote station in the field back to headquarters to be broadcast. They didn’t encrypt those signals, …

Speaking of radios, I’ve been trying to understand light recently and it’s difficult. I find that for most things, I have a visual intuitive model to reason about things. But I hav…

I find the metabolic cancer hypothesis to be extremely compelling. Did you happen to find this link on HN originally?

A toast to good health

It’s actually false

This is actually incorrect. For millions of years humans ate nothing but animals. When you eat an entire animal, including its organs, you are getting every macronutrient and micro…

It was all people ate for millions of years

Over the past two years I have fallen down a medical rabbit hole that has revealed some really weird things to me. I don’t know how to explain it convincingly so I’ll just get it o…

What a nothing burger.

The guy who runs signal said that he believes science isn’t about discovering truth. I still can’t wrap my head around it.

I think you misread my comment.

Today the infrastructure for serving information over the internet is privately owned, and liberals say that it’s ok for private companies to censor people on their platforms, and …

When will people wake up and realize that ML and AI are out of control?

I have literally never heard an account of someone who is an expert in a field or topic being impressed with the accuracy of a mainstream media report on that field or topic. What …

You lack good reading in history. If everyone thought like you, science would stagnate. You make the common error: to see all “on-paper,” unproven ideas as equal. Comparing the rea…

People talk about Karys inexplicable beliefs about HIV. Why does nobody point out, as written in the speech, the fact that prior to PCR Kary explained the process of PCR to all of …

Check the news, idiot

But I don’t even need to look it up to know that they made absolutely sure to get credit for every single bombing. Why is that missing here?