Viewing profile — Oreko
Oreko
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Nov 24, 2022, 5:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4
- Public activity
- 7 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Oreko
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35160100
I haven't read their protocol, but you can easily implement PIR using FHE through polynomial evaluation.
-
comment
Comment #34871685
SCRAM seems incredibly insecure. Does anyone have information on how many servers support SCRAM?
-
comment
Comment #34799229
Is there a scheme using these principles that isn't known to be insecure? Or one that has a proof of security by reduction to a known (or supposed) hard problem? A brief look onlin…
-
comment
Comment #34295703
Another confusion on my part, above the protocol Sc00bz writes: " Client without password has: idC = client identity P = hashToPoint(p) c S = s * P Reg = reg * G (reg = registratio…
-
comment
Comment #34295665
Turns out I misread part of the protocol. I mixed up "b" stored by the server in the registration phase and the "b" used in the online phase. In that case, the adversary can't comp…
-
comment
Comment #34294044
Augmented is a common label for these kind of PAKEs. Generally speaking, asymmetric, verifier-based, and augmented are all three interchangeable. Sc00bz made a comment[1] on reddit…
-
comment
Comment #34291670
Hi, I perform research in the area of PAKEs. I'm not a "foremost expert" but I know a bit. Before I start, I don't believe that it's standard to use the term "doubly augmented PAKE…