Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Omnus

Omnus

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jul 09, 2014, 3:26 PM UTC
HN karma
152
Public activity
59 items

About Omnus

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25410019

    I think I'll have an alpha/beta testing period with interested volunteers. Then hopefully sell it. Then after some years and waning interest, probably open source it.

  2. comment
    Comment #25398322

    I am making a game. I use Vim (infinitely faster and more product than other text editors) and write a single command in my terminal to compile. Vim makes a lot of sense when you w…

  3. comment
    Comment #25394470

    None of those criticisms apply to these vaccine studies. There are many issues that can arise in trials, of course. But the current batch of 3-phase mRNA-based vaccine trials have …

  4. comment
    Comment #25394433

    No. The onus is on you to explain why experts who have devoted their entire lives to groundbreaking vaccine research are wrong. It's like arguing with a 5 year old.

  5. comment
    Comment #25393079

    I'm not going to explain how clinical trials work and why you should trust that process. Again, bad situations do not invalidate all work being done in a field.

  6. comment
    Comment #25392047

    "So much faith"? People are just following the science. Are you really arguing that because one bad situation has occurred involving pharmaceutical companies, we should assume ever…

  7. comment
    Comment #25378092

    It'll be dead within 18-24 months.

  8. comment
    Comment #17491333

    That physical damage to the brain results in loss or impairment of consciousness, and that there is absolutely no evidence that total biological death would entail anything but the…

  9. comment
    Comment #17491318

    First of all, I don't "hypothesize" anything - I am just pointing out what seems to be the obvious answer to "what happens when you die?". When the brain is damaged or undergoes ch…

  10. comment
    Comment #17486274

    lmao - "I can't understand why non-religious people are afraid of death except for literally all of the most obvious reasons that they should be". It's baffling that people say the…

  11. comment
    Comment #17485357

    Terrified is the wrong word. Western culture simply understands the reality of the situation. Sure, you can delude an entire society with fairy tales and they will feel better abou…

  12. comment
    Comment #17485019

    I'm skeptical that any of those things actually "prepare" people to face death in the first place. Feeling like you're "prepared" weeks, months, or years before the final hours of …

  13. comment
    Comment #17484870

    Exactly. Even if you try to make the decision ahead of time with a sound mind, where do you draw the line? And even if the line is drawn, what happens if you change your mind later…

  14. comment
    Comment #17441144

    You know you're missing the point, right? There are some jobs that people just don't tend to enjoy or find meaningful. You can incentive people to do them by paying them lots of mo…

  15. comment
    Comment #17416446

    You don't seem to understand the actual problems with screening. Try learning about the field before implying the FDA isn't doing their job: https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.h60…

  16. comment
    Comment #17416434

    There is a huge misconception about the value of screening in the general population. It doesn't do what most people think it does. Even with emotional adjustment it is entirely un…

  17. comment
    Comment #17409891

    People were fooled by hype, a usual occurrence with new "AI" technology. That says nothing about how "revolutionary" it is.

  18. comment
    Comment #17409864

    What on Earth are you talking about? The point was not that anything humans can do within 90 seconds is non-revolutionary when implemented in machines. An artist can create somethi…

  19. comment
    Comment #17409465

    It "feels revolutionary" to the author, but it is literally only capable of handling the simplest restaurant and hair salon reservations (the kind of thing you could do yourself in…

  20. comment
    Comment #17298132

    Yes - the FDA is (surprisingly?) receptive and psilocybin (among others) could be approved in the next few years, maybe up to a decade depending on results. https://www.nature.com/…

  21. comment
    Comment #17275595

    It is entirely unremarkable that people should put "feeling" in italics in order to emphasize it, because it is precisely the thing gets handwavy non-explanations (like yours) from…

  22. comment
    Comment #17274205

    There is no such "hidden assumption" - the question is just literally asking what the difference is between the non-conscious program and the conscious one (in your case).

  23. comment
    Comment #17274176

    People used to make this same argument about why things fall to the ground when you let go of them. "Is it really surprising? Why wouldn't they just fall down? What kind of answer …

  24. comment
    Comment #17246634

    Well it's not AI or ML really - it's hand-picked algorithmic composition with additional contributions from human composers. The holy grail AI composer would be able to generate un…

  25. comment
    Comment #17239267

    Sure it's well known. But that's not what he was asking. He was specifically asking about the number of cancers in people below 40. 140k is for all ages.