Viewing profile — Omnus
Omnus
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 09, 2014, 3:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 152
- Public activity
- 59 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Omnus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25410019
I think I'll have an alpha/beta testing period with interested volunteers. Then hopefully sell it. Then after some years and waning interest, probably open source it.
-
comment
Comment #25398322
I am making a game. I use Vim (infinitely faster and more product than other text editors) and write a single command in my terminal to compile. Vim makes a lot of sense when you w…
-
comment
Comment #25394470
None of those criticisms apply to these vaccine studies. There are many issues that can arise in trials, of course. But the current batch of 3-phase mRNA-based vaccine trials have …
-
comment
Comment #25394433
No. The onus is on you to explain why experts who have devoted their entire lives to groundbreaking vaccine research are wrong. It's like arguing with a 5 year old.
-
comment
Comment #25393079
I'm not going to explain how clinical trials work and why you should trust that process. Again, bad situations do not invalidate all work being done in a field.
-
comment
Comment #25392047
"So much faith"? People are just following the science. Are you really arguing that because one bad situation has occurred involving pharmaceutical companies, we should assume ever…
-
comment
Comment #25378092
It'll be dead within 18-24 months.
-
comment
Comment #17491333
That physical damage to the brain results in loss or impairment of consciousness, and that there is absolutely no evidence that total biological death would entail anything but the…
-
comment
Comment #17491318
First of all, I don't "hypothesize" anything - I am just pointing out what seems to be the obvious answer to "what happens when you die?". When the brain is damaged or undergoes ch…
-
comment
Comment #17486274
lmao - "I can't understand why non-religious people are afraid of death except for literally all of the most obvious reasons that they should be". It's baffling that people say the…
-
comment
Comment #17485357
Terrified is the wrong word. Western culture simply understands the reality of the situation. Sure, you can delude an entire society with fairy tales and they will feel better abou…
-
comment
Comment #17485019
I'm skeptical that any of those things actually "prepare" people to face death in the first place. Feeling like you're "prepared" weeks, months, or years before the final hours of …
-
comment
Comment #17484870
Exactly. Even if you try to make the decision ahead of time with a sound mind, where do you draw the line? And even if the line is drawn, what happens if you change your mind later…
-
comment
Comment #17441144
You know you're missing the point, right? There are some jobs that people just don't tend to enjoy or find meaningful. You can incentive people to do them by paying them lots of mo…
-
comment
Comment #17416446
You don't seem to understand the actual problems with screening. Try learning about the field before implying the FDA isn't doing their job: https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.h60…
-
comment
Comment #17416434
There is a huge misconception about the value of screening in the general population. It doesn't do what most people think it does. Even with emotional adjustment it is entirely un…
-
comment
Comment #17409891
People were fooled by hype, a usual occurrence with new "AI" technology. That says nothing about how "revolutionary" it is.
-
comment
Comment #17409864
What on Earth are you talking about? The point was not that anything humans can do within 90 seconds is non-revolutionary when implemented in machines. An artist can create somethi…
-
comment
Comment #17409465
It "feels revolutionary" to the author, but it is literally only capable of handling the simplest restaurant and hair salon reservations (the kind of thing you could do yourself in…
-
comment
Comment #17298132
Yes - the FDA is (surprisingly?) receptive and psilocybin (among others) could be approved in the next few years, maybe up to a decade depending on results. https://www.nature.com/…
-
comment
Comment #17275595
It is entirely unremarkable that people should put "feeling" in italics in order to emphasize it, because it is precisely the thing gets handwavy non-explanations (like yours) from…
-
comment
Comment #17274205
There is no such "hidden assumption" - the question is just literally asking what the difference is between the non-conscious program and the conscious one (in your case).
-
comment
Comment #17274176
People used to make this same argument about why things fall to the ground when you let go of them. "Is it really surprising? Why wouldn't they just fall down? What kind of answer …
-
comment
Comment #17246634
Well it's not AI or ML really - it's hand-picked algorithmic composition with additional contributions from human composers. The holy grail AI composer would be able to generate un…
-
comment
Comment #17239267
Sure it's well known. But that's not what he was asking. He was specifically asking about the number of cancers in people below 40. 140k is for all ages.