Viewing profile — Olical
Olical
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 05, 2013, 4:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 23
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Olical
https://oli.me.uk/
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/olical; my proof: https://keybase.io/olical/sigs/CrrJNGzokM5jxakpWFSyv4pOp29Q5v5-ZhE_tsRcO04 ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41499190
I've been writing my config and plugins in it for years :) https://github.com/Olical/conjure https://github.com/Olical/nfnl
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35456652
I'm the author, I think both. I'm working on DAP ( https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/ ) support for Clojure to use alongside Conjure connected to the same running …
-
comment
Comment #25444553
I'm trying to make the neovim lisp world a little more pleasant with Conjure :) just for those that absolutely can not switch to emacs long term (like me) https://github.com/Olical…
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #21692519
Glad I could be of assistance :D (sorry in advance for any time lost to Lisp fun times)
-
comment
Comment #21692508
Oh does it? Nice! I am a 100% Neovim user so I focus on that but if this works in Vim 8+ with minimal changes I'm totally open to pull requests to support / document it!
-
comment
Comment #21692502
I'm the author, I've been in love with Lisp for years now (I'm a recovering JavaScript programmer) but refuse to leave Vim, Vim Script is absolutely awful for anything more than si…
- story
-
comment
Comment #19471998
The p in prepl stands for programmable or programs, as in, for programs. If you open up a socket REPL you can connect to it and send code + receive results but they're printed with…
-
comment
Comment #19471775
Already there :) K will look up docs for the symbol under the cursor. Pretty sure fireplace has this though... Example of the doc output: https://imgur.com/vSB5Fv5.png
-
comment
Comment #19471104
Yep, sure thing, good idea. I was going to do an asciinema video or something, I only got around to writing the README as it stands yesterday, it's the first time I'm showing it of…
-
comment
Comment #19470748
Hi, I'm the author and that means a lot to read! It's been a labour of love going back and forth on rewrites and ideas for about six months so it'll mean the world to me if it ends…
-
comment
Comment #6123974
Streamlined, removed the insanity, tested and documented. Any better? https://github.com/Wolfy87/tuple
-
comment
Comment #6123969
Huh, I never knew that. Thanks! As long as you're in a decent environment that kind of definition becomes a lot smoother. I like it.
-
comment
Comment #6123446
The problem with that being that you redefine the unpack function every time a tuple is created. The this._NAME = VALUE; may look awful but it's more efficient. You are just relyin…
-
comment
Comment #6122990
So what if I made immutable. You can only set once and unpack to a function that can name the values. I could also drop the valueOf usage. Does that sound saner? It is definitely s…
-
comment
Comment #6122313
Okay, that isn't integral though. This could easily be left out if desired. It's not coercing to a number either, it's simply concatenating. This would work with strings too or any…
-
comment
Comment #6122179
It fills the array backwards because that is the most efficient loop possible within JavaScript when the order does not matter. I added a pack method to enforce some weak limiting …