Viewing profile — OSI-Auflauf
OSI-Auflauf
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 11:13 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 50
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About OSI-Auflauf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42490944
This can be boiled down to half a page. Why put in the chatgpt manure to.inflate it.
-
comment
Comment #42490937
Ugh so much inflated text and self congratulation to something that in the end boils down to trusting you as authority again.
-
comment
Comment #42072420
https://www.watchvigilantesinc.com/
-
comment
Comment #41976002
Don't waste your time with dns adblocking. If you are serious about network side blocking do tls interception (lmao) but that is a lot of maintenance, adds other attack surface and…
-
comment
Comment #41451407
I use wg-quick via the parameterized systemd unit (wg-quick@.service) all the time and never had selinux blocks. Which fedora are you on?
-
comment
Comment #41433477
Seen devices with IPMI that had by design unauthenticated admin login to the IPMI from the host side that was not removable. They also could flash IPMI firmware from the host. So i…
-
comment
Comment #41424752
Shoutout to Heads for even attempting to make this. But even that is far from complete. At least the UX is a little better than standard.
-
comment
Comment #41424739
Lennart is technically doing good work. While his tools are less complicated than the current hilariously convoluted standard boot process, they are still too complicated to use we…
-
comment
Comment #41277536
Many surface brand devices had a toggle in the bios for something like "security level" for years. Which is a switch between Windows signing CA only and Windows signing CA + 3rd pa…
-
comment
Comment #41277517
If firmware not buggy: If Secureboot is set up to use keys which never signed any bootloader that lets you modify the system pre-login.: Then it kind of matters. If you have a gami…
-
comment
Comment #40362192
Thats interesting. Are you ok for a 1on1 talk about this topic?
-
comment
Comment #40342924
Both do that.
-
comment
Comment #40342756
You compare apples with oranges. Because if you'd compare the apples , you'd notice one of them has no usable E2E. Yes oranges umm phone numbers is a problem. They have that both. …
-
comment
Comment #40342694
Irs super complicated to use. And you need an existing Telegram account to actually handle that cryptocurrency to buy these pseudo-numbers outside of the telephone namespace. Guess…
-
comment
Comment #40342379
That repo is not fully open. Release lag -> Telegram foss needs to wrangle the release every time. Fdroid CI takes its time.
-
comment
Comment #40342370
Yes and thats why users spend sometimes months on old builds. Also which distro packages Telegram? Fedora doesn't. Debian does but at times it was so old the client crashed from re…
-
comment
Comment #40342321
You need a phone number to sign up for Telegram as well. And you can correlate username to phone number not that hard in most standard setting cases.
-
comment
Comment #40342291
Telegram Foss clients exist only because of unpaid volunteers that take Telegrams messy mix of open and closed parts and rip closed parts out and replace them. The Telegram organis…
-
comment
Comment #40342238
Because theirs was particularly bad. They xored a server provided nonce in their modified DH scheme making their side able to mitm the key exchanges.
-
comment
Comment #40342196
Signal has got Usernames now. You can block number discovery. You can't resolve username to number. Your main account ID internally is not your number anymore. If 2 users add you u…
-
comment
Comment #40342173
On Signal vs Telegram: Telegrams Encryption is off most of the time. They have serverside access to messages. The optional E2E is annoying to use and isnt even available on every p…
-
comment
Comment #39603823
> p2p, signing, local first, yadda yadda curl | bash is the recommended way to install.
-
story
Ask HN: How do you ensure trust in infra?
In light of Lawful interception, existance of corrupt law enforcement agencies. How do you protect your namespaces on the net?
-
comment
Comment #38139728
When does this come from a not user hostile company?
-
comment
Comment #38139436
What use is that when the policy is defined by the same person?