Viewing profile — Nrpf
Nrpf
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 20, 2015, 12:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 16
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Nrpf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #10891548
Its also for general programming.
-
comment
Comment #10891363
What do you think about Julia?
-
comment
Comment #10890896
Julia
-
comment
Comment #10748703
Looking forward. I was about to embark with python on a new long term project, but I might delay that pending the new blog post. If possible do you have a guestimate on what sort o…
-
comment
Comment #10748694
Type unstable Julia is often slower than python.
-
comment
Comment #10748160
Actually no. Naive Julia is often slower than python. Vectorized Array expressions are on par with numpy and slower than numba. "type unstable", IO and text processing code is also…
-
comment
Comment #10745547
Very glad to hear that. Anywhere roadmap/ central place where I can contribute and follow progress?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #10745256
Thanks. The link seemed still to be single inheritance focus (sorry, I don't know the right terminology I come from a OO background.) but I could be wrong. Though I did get the sen…
-
comment
Comment #10745039
User defined types/classes are currently being worked on in an open PR. Excellent counterpoint for the time being, though. Aside- Do you know if multiple inheritance/traits will ha…
-
comment
Comment #10744939
no its not. Rcpp is cpp syntax and semantics. Look at the Numba example..its pure python with one decorator.
-
comment
Comment #10744912
Julia also requires subsets of the language. Try writing rolled array expressions (in a loop or otherwise) in Julia and in Numba and see which one is faster. Also try IO or text pr…
-
comment
Comment #10744896
Right now, numba is a better compiler than Julia has. You can write array expressions and loops in numba and it will do fusion/deforestation to eliminate temporaries giving you fas…
-
comment
Comment #10744895
Right now, numba is a better compiler than Julia has. You can write array expressions and loops in numba and it will do fusion/deforestation to eliminate temporaries giving you fas…
- story
-
comment
Comment #10665157
The dev team is pretty responsive and prioritize adding features based on bug reports like this. Can you open an issue? https://github.com/numba/numba
-
comment
Comment #10659491
Or you can use Numba to write gil free imperative code as well.
-
comment
Comment #10659490
Or you can use Numba to write gil free imperative code as well.
-
comment
Comment #10647619
You mean IRLS or SGD or something like that?
-
comment
Comment #10583720
Any tidbits about whats in store for the stats ecosystem? Tidyr/Dplyr style workflow? Flexible and Generalized stats MLE/ Bayesian modeling using distributions? Streaming and out o…
- story
-
comment
Comment #10579058
Or you can use numba and with pure python syntax and get really fast.
-
comment
Comment #10570902
Actually I'm waiting for 3 based....
-
comment
Comment #10570790
"many of the cons in the language will be solved" Can you elaborate on this? Re type system, how does it compare to python in use?