Viewing profile — Neslit
Neslit
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Sep 23, 2013, 1:46 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 42
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Neslit
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #11578334
Are there Bayesian interpretations of these results?
-
comment
Comment #11551934
I don't know if you were including me, but either way I'm sorry and I'll stop now (just saw this). For the record: I sincerely am not trying to annoy or provoke anyone; I've been c…
-
comment
Comment #11551854
The point there is that, say humans were largely the same but instead we naturally lived a very long time, e.g. a thousand years. Then someone comes to you and says, "Hey I have th…
-
comment
Comment #11551707
“I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. I don't want to live on in the hearts of my countrymen; I want to live on in …
-
comment
Comment #11551548
>Except we're not machines. I only mean that we're machines enough so that medical techniques work. We are made of parts that break and can be fixed. This is on extremely solid emp…
-
comment
Comment #11551494
>Life and death are complementary Hm, I hear people say this a lot, but I genuinely can't empathize with where they are coming from. This is a blank spot in my map. Could you say m…
-
comment
Comment #11551326
>filled with a total dread of death I'm not sure I've successfully communicated my feeling about this. It's less like a total dread of death and more like a total dread of losing l…
-
comment
Comment #11551196
This is genuinely not obvious to me. What convinced you of this? Or, what do you think the world would look like if there were people who actually had a strong, reasonable, non-ins…
-
comment
Comment #11549636
Uh, there's a whole lot of mass in the universe; this isn't really a limiting factor, and won't be for quite a long time.
-
comment
Comment #11549606
>we would be better off if no one died (Clarification: I think we'd obviously be better off if no one involuntarily died.) I don't think I've been hasty in my thinking. What is the…
-
comment
Comment #11549509
But, do you agree that the part where the whole human mind (not just some cells) has to die---a soul annihilated permanently---is not really a good thing, even if it happens to be …
-
comment
Comment #11549478
Ha :/ Too real. > we're all screwed and you were born a few hundred years too early. It's not a great option, but cryonics seems way better than nothing. (Under the assumptions tha…
-
comment
Comment #11549403
Um? Sorry for being frank, but: are you saying you would commit suicide if the world were more confusing? In any case, I doubt that our future civilization would be at a total loss…
-
comment
Comment #11549358
>Yes, I think it is extremely unlikely people will figure out thousand-year lifespans. Why? Do you think this would withstand a thousand years of human ingenuity? I'm confused wher…
-
comment
Comment #11549260
Well, yeah :P This is a strong argument for trying to prevent fatal accidents!
-
comment
Comment #11549232
>That seems like a population that would be pretty hard to keep going without having a few extra Earths. Do you think this problem is merely very difficult, or literally impossible…
-
comment
Comment #11549129
Does this seem like a desirable state of affairs? I think I'd rather not have anyone die involuntarily. If we put our minds to it, I bet we could figure out how to not have anyone …
-
comment
Comment #11549082
Personally, I really like living, mainly because there's a lot of awesome stuff to do and see and build, stories to tell, people to be with, etc. The logical next step is that I do…
-
comment
Comment #11548992
Do you mean because of limited resources like food and space? Sure, but (1) these look like difficult but quite solvable problems (we are engineers, after all) and (2) the alternat…
-
comment
Comment #11548811
Ok, I think I can see why that would be extra frustrating, on top of the already quite sufficient horror of death. Nevertheless, it is probably a good idea to stay civil and try to…
-
comment
Comment #11548642
To put it bluntly, I can think of a number of other cases where (1) people say things to children because it is more pleasant or convenient, not because it is true, and (2) these m…
-
comment
Comment #11548625
I agree that it is confusing and painful (and stupid) that cryopreservation does not get way more attention. But, your comment seems a little overly barbed, no? It seems like there…
-
comment
Comment #9633480
That is hilarious. Source, or were you kidding? (I legitimately can't tell.)
-
comment
Comment #9598168
>we're clear on the fact that for quite a bit of time to come, cryonics is a vulnerable storage facility critically dependent on the infrastructure and benevolent indifference of o…
-
comment
Comment #9598028
Thanks for the detailed answer. >If you believe plastination has a decent chance of preserving people's minds, you're operating under the assumption that the connectome itself will…