Viewing profile — MuteXR
MuteXR
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 04, 2022, 5:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 176
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About MuteXR
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48853742
Except for the monument still being there, and being the main thing everyone uses still.
-
comment
Comment #48853696
The Postgres license is already fully compatible with the AGPL. BSD/MIT is more permissive.
-
comment
Comment #48348288
The absolute bulk of the LOC introduced are docs and a unit test system. Let's not just make stuff up now.
-
comment
Comment #48145887
If it were a true honeypot by a state agency, they'd be able to just lie about having nothing too.
-
comment
Comment #47502688
You still have a human who actually ends up reviewing the code, though. Now if the review was AI powered... (glances at openclaw)
-
comment
Comment #47502578
You know that people can already write backdoored code, right?
-
comment
Comment #47153294
Logic stored in the database, licensed under BSL. Welcome back, 90s. I still don't get why this project has hype.
-
comment
Comment #46793635
"Just install LaTeX" is really not a valid response when the LaTeX toolchain is a genuine nightmare to work with. I could do it but still use Overleaf. Managing that locally is jus…
-
comment
Comment #46064180
Why respond to an obviously dumb argument?
-
comment
Comment #46064149
What does this even mean?
-
comment
Comment #45666513
Keep in mind this is the same project that removed all useful functionality from the included web UI in the community edition with the excuse that it was too much effort to maintai…
-
comment
Comment #45435284
And you can also do so with ZFS. OP has hit a weird issue that normal usage won't ever get. One that should not exist, of course, but certainly not a normal one.
-
comment
Comment #45097723
The JWT standard is known to be full of nonsense. Acting like this is some non-issue is hilariously disconnected from reality.
-
comment
Comment #44804633
Data processing? Reasoning on supplied data?
-
comment
Comment #43225034
Following that logic it would be literally impossible to trust any part of their infra. They had a bad build container, the rest of their stuff was solid.
-
comment
Comment #41250946
You SHIPPED CODE THAT YOU KNEW HAD A SIDE CHANNEL????? WHAT?
-
comment
Comment #39332139
Your tiny Postfix server is nothing compared to what large scale mail hosting entails.
-
comment
Comment #38981066
Objective morality is how a child sees the world. Not moving on from that is embarrassing.
-
comment
Comment #38188954
why does any of this even matter?
-
comment
Comment #38064805
And a small service can go under anytime, without any real warning. Most big providers end up being cheaper for you as well. Vercel is insanely expensive.
-
comment
Comment #37890660
There is literally no info there except rumors which OP doesn't even specify the source of.
-
comment
Comment #37248298
Feels like an odd thing to post now. It's almost been three years. Hacktoberfest has been opt-in ever since, and is clearly doing fine when it comes to participants. They ran out o…
-
comment
Comment #36562231
They do. Look at Hubzilla.
-
comment
Comment #36562216
Blocks being public in ActivityPub is already a problem. Bad instances run bots dedicated to finding out if someone blocked someone on the server and making public posts calling fo…
-
comment
Comment #36553501
It isn't. This is a nonsense excuse.