Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — MuteXR

MuteXR

HN member
Joined
Sun, Dec 04, 2022, 5:34 PM UTC
HN karma
176
Public activity
30 items

About MuteXR

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48853742

    Except for the monument still being there, and being the main thing everyone uses still.

  2. comment
    Comment #48853696

    The Postgres license is already fully compatible with the AGPL. BSD/MIT is more permissive.

  3. comment
    Comment #48348288

    The absolute bulk of the LOC introduced are docs and a unit test system. Let's not just make stuff up now.

  4. comment
    Comment #48145887

    If it were a true honeypot by a state agency, they'd be able to just lie about having nothing too.

  5. comment
    Comment #47502688

    You still have a human who actually ends up reviewing the code, though. Now if the review was AI powered... (glances at openclaw)

  6. comment
    Comment #47502578

    You know that people can already write backdoored code, right?

  7. comment
    Comment #47153294

    Logic stored in the database, licensed under BSL. Welcome back, 90s. I still don't get why this project has hype.

  8. comment
    Comment #46793635

    "Just install LaTeX" is really not a valid response when the LaTeX toolchain is a genuine nightmare to work with. I could do it but still use Overleaf. Managing that locally is jus…

  9. comment
    Comment #46064180

    Why respond to an obviously dumb argument?

  10. comment
    Comment #46064149

    What does this even mean?

  11. comment
    Comment #45666513

    Keep in mind this is the same project that removed all useful functionality from the included web UI in the community edition with the excuse that it was too much effort to maintai…

  12. comment
    Comment #45435284

    And you can also do so with ZFS. OP has hit a weird issue that normal usage won't ever get. One that should not exist, of course, but certainly not a normal one.

  13. comment
    Comment #45097723

    The JWT standard is known to be full of nonsense. Acting like this is some non-issue is hilariously disconnected from reality.

  14. comment
    Comment #44804633

    Data processing? Reasoning on supplied data?

  15. comment
    Comment #43225034

    Following that logic it would be literally impossible to trust any part of their infra. They had a bad build container, the rest of their stuff was solid.

  16. comment
    Comment #41250946

    You SHIPPED CODE THAT YOU KNEW HAD A SIDE CHANNEL????? WHAT?

  17. comment
    Comment #39332139

    Your tiny Postfix server is nothing compared to what large scale mail hosting entails.

  18. comment
    Comment #38981066

    Objective morality is how a child sees the world. Not moving on from that is embarrassing.

  19. comment
    Comment #38188954

    why does any of this even matter?

  20. comment
    Comment #38064805

    And a small service can go under anytime, without any real warning. Most big providers end up being cheaper for you as well. Vercel is insanely expensive.

  21. comment
    Comment #37890660

    There is literally no info there except rumors which OP doesn't even specify the source of.

  22. comment
    Comment #37248298

    Feels like an odd thing to post now. It's almost been three years. Hacktoberfest has been opt-in ever since, and is clearly doing fine when it comes to participants. They ran out o…

  23. comment
    Comment #36562231

    They do. Look at Hubzilla.

  24. comment
    Comment #36562216

    Blocks being public in ActivityPub is already a problem. Bad instances run bots dedicated to finding out if someone blocked someone on the server and making public posts calling fo…

  25. comment
    Comment #36553501

    It isn't. This is a nonsense excuse.