Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Msurrow

Msurrow

HN member
Joined
Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 4:17 PM UTC
HN karma
659
Public activity
155 items

About Msurrow

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49032415

    Honest question: For let’s say a senior developer having to go through all of these steps for the model to implement a feature: > Product Design > System Architecture > Program Des…

  2. comment
    Comment #48708220

    > month ago there was a wave of posts and tweets about engineers walking around cafes and parks with their MacBooks propped half-open, as fully closing the lid forces sleep that st…

  3. comment
    Comment #47181985

    > They would NEVER admit any failure in their society, no matter the hard evidence in front of their eyes. That must be the swedes. Danes complain constantly, about everything. Edi…

  4. comment
    Comment #47173525

    I think he meant that at that time all users were programmers. Yes, _all_ .

  5. comment
    Comment #47114038

    I agree that yes most just want PnP and basically don’t care about security. But it seemed on the posts above that there was an engineering complexity, and a robot vaccum needs loc…

  6. comment
    Comment #47112992

    I have not knowledge of this kind of software dev/hw production, so can you please explain why the units cant just be born with a default pass and then have the setup process (whic…

  7. comment
    Comment #47100462

    Yeah was thinking the same thing. I wonder if the author didnt known that passpory chip == fingerprint. And FP is a much worse modality to have registered because, as opposed to Fa…

  8. comment
    Comment #47071863

    That that is exactly why [more] regulation is necessary! Regulation is not done with the purpose of preventing companies from profits. It is done because companies cannot be expect…

  9. comment
    Comment #46932155

    No, they are not. Doesn’t matter how many LoC; it only take 1 LoC to introduce a vulnerability. Wireguard is a protocol. So what implementation is “very intentional about its choic…

  10. comment
    Comment #46912323

    You are still implying that wireguard are somehow different from ssh in its suceptibilty to vulnerabilities existing or being introduced into its codebase. And it simply is not. Ed…

  11. comment
    Comment #46911275

    I’m calling it consultant speak because your response to an argument is to bring up something else, instead of actually responding. The same with this last reply; you can keep thro…

  12. comment
    Comment #46899674

    Sure, no one said it wasnt layered. But saying ssh is a risk “on principle” due to possible vulnerabilities, and then implying that if wireguard is used then that risk isnt there i…

  13. comment
    Comment #46896866

    But doesn’t your argument that the principal risk [with ssh] is vulnerabilities also apply to the alternatives you say is best practice? Firewalling off ssh (but not http(s)) has t…

  14. comment
    Comment #46579976

    You cant.

  15. comment
    Comment #46414664

    Depends on environment variable P=NP

  16. comment
    Comment #46373921

    > *If you don't want your LG TV quietly snooping on what you watch and using it to serve you ads, here's how to turn Live Plus off. If LG makes money from snooping on you, what mak…

  17. comment
    Comment #46360401

    Yes, it does. First of all: occam's razor. Political theatrics seems simpler than the US defence/intelligence forces sudenly realizing that drones can be launched from ships. Esp. …

  18. comment
    Comment #46359117

    The construction on some of these windmill farms started years ago. Before that permits & legal has been in the works for a long time. This surely included security clearances. The…

  19. comment
    Comment #46314437

    Man, I got my rope out for this..

  20. comment
    Comment #46216618

    If the employer says so and I do so anyway then that’s a employment issue. I still have to follow company rules. But the point is that the company needs to delete the collected dat…

  21. comment
    Comment #46216380

    Yes. GDPR covers all handling of PII that a company does. And its sort of default deny, meaning that a company is not allowed to handle (process and/or store) your data UNLESS it h…

  22. comment
    Comment #45891667

    If that’s the case why give the OSS project any time to fix at all before public disclosure? They should just publish immediately, no? Warn other users asap.

  23. comment
    Comment #45891613

    My takeaway from the article was not that the report was a problem, but a change in approach from Google that they’d disclose publicly after X days, regardless of if the project ha…

  24. comment
    Comment #45891546

    In addition to your point, it seems obvious that disclosure policy for FOSS should be “when patch available” and not static X days. The security issue should certainly be disclosed…

  25. comment
    Comment #45832598

    The OP/article is very clear and very direct on what the problems are. The response is so typical american conflict-shy “let’s talk so we can slowly dimish your critique, and also …