Viewing profile — MrScruff
MrScruff
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 12, 2010, 11:11 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,923
- Public activity
- 682 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About MrScruff
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49165564
I got my girlfriend to install Claude Code and she was happily able to create software with it completely independently of me.
-
comment
Comment #48785983
Yeah exactly. After a hard day when my brain is frazzled, a workout will actually make me feel better.
-
comment
Comment #48785546
I think what the parent post was saying is that there is a finite amount of useful mental function time in any one day, and once you’ve exhausted this any attempted learning will b…
-
comment
Comment #48772675
Considering all of the great research that has come from his labs (eg. DINO, Segment Anything) I don’t think that’s fair (no pun intended).
-
comment
Comment #48546256
I’m normally comparing frontier open/cheap models against frontier closed source. I use deepseek/glm regularly, they’re fine and you can get real work done with them but it’s super…
-
comment
Comment #48546055
You really need to take the benchmarks with a massive pinch of salt. I’ve been testing local LLMs since the original llama and there’s nothing I’ve tried that is in the same catego…
-
comment
Comment #48515088
I think this is true for projects beyond a certain complexity. I have 100% vibe coded projects with tens of thousands LOC, and haven't seen any real issues with fully automated mai…
-
comment
Comment #48433980
That would imply that the biological physical substrate is necessary for conciousness, which I don't think you can say with any degree of certainty. It's not an assumption I would …
-
comment
Comment #48409736
Ah, mea culpa.
-
comment
Comment #48397069
My point was the "stochastic parrot" label can be both true and irrelevant. LLMs are predicting the next token based on their training data, so at that level "stochastic parrot" is…
-
comment
Comment #48396823
I think (rather ironically) you're reacting to the version of my comment you have in your mind rather than what I actually wrote. My point was that "stochastic parrot" is reduction…
-
comment
Comment #48395845
I can't actually figure out what you're reacting to - perhaps you could elaborate?
-
comment
Comment #48395727
The reason people are confused by LLMs is that they are stochastic parrots. They do an incredibly good job of emulating human behaviours and speech patterns as that's what they've …
-
comment
Comment #48395680
What we do know is that conciousness is not binary and that it emerged through evolution. That doesn't entirely rule out your magic tsar bomb particle but it gives a strong indicat…
-
comment
Comment #48395611
The problem with this is that the word 'hot' only has meaning to a conscious being. And while we don't know what conciousness is, it's extremely hard to argue it's not an emergent …
-
comment
Comment #48395556
Do you believe consciousness to be an emergent property of the laws of physics?
-
comment
Comment #48321070
You can avoid the smells with a prompt. I have a benchmark involving short story writing within specific styles and the level of sophistication achievable is increasing over time, …
-
comment
Comment #48320781
This is true, but what is also true is that with each new generation of models (and not just for code generation) it becomes less and less true.
-
comment
Comment #48320760
I’d probably word it differently but I agree with much of the sentiment here. I’m also reminded of the stat where 93% of drivers rated themselves as above average.
-
comment
Comment #48256372
Practically, this is just about confidence values, anticipated blast radius and balancing testing vs review overhead.
-
comment
Comment #48073120
It's ASI with jagged intelligence, which is probably what it will remain for a while. It still sounds to me like remarkable automation rather than something that's expanding the fr…
-
comment
Comment #48048860
Indeed. To be honest, I think everyone on HN is aware of how LLMs work at this point, it’s not actually adding a great deal to the discussion to keep going on about autocomplete or…
-
comment
Comment #48048817
The results being a lot better crafted by hand I would agree with, if one removes any notion of a time constraint. Sometimes the comparison point is between the LLM authored softwa…
-
comment
Comment #48048278
Which is what?
-
comment
Comment #48048046
I think the other aspect to this which you allude to at the end is that all of these arguments start with the assumption that all human software engineers produce high quality code…