Viewing profile — MrGunn
MrGunn
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 25, 2008, 6:16 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 57
- Public activity
- 51 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About MrGunn
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26692679
Thanks for the heads up, we're looking into this at Quora.
-
comment
Comment #23501764
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I agree publishers could do more to change & I especially think we should do more to make all the changes that are happening under the hood more vi…
-
comment
Comment #23501488
To solve your immediate problem, just grab the DOI here: https://apps.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery They also have an API from which you can fetch DOIs in various ways. DOIs are a s…
-
comment
Comment #23500698
Journals do transfer among publishers, go out of business, etc so you shouldn't expect a direct link like that to be stable. The recommended practice is to use the DOI. Would using…
-
comment
Comment #23492471
The majority (70% or so) of submissions are desk-rejected without even being sent for review, and the ability to do that well is something that's learned over time with extensive d…
-
comment
Comment #23492386
Hey Gwern, big fan of your GPT2 work. I notice I'm surprised to hear you say you struggle daily to fix broken links to the Elsevier catalog at ScienceDirect, because the links are …
-
comment
Comment #23492330
As a researcher, I understand the frustrations with the publishing process. I spent years complaining about it, then I decided to do something. A few years later, my company was ac…
-
comment
Comment #18728099
Preprints are great & everyone should post a preprint as soon as they're ready to share what they've been working on. That said, there's a big difference between journals and prepr…
-
comment
Comment #18727899
Not only does Elsevier have a very permissive preprint policy, but they own a network of preprint servers - SSRN. Just this morning, I've replied to several factually incorrect sta…
-
comment
Comment #18727801
This isn't true: https://twitter.com/TomReller/status/1075817382726250496?s=1...
-
comment
Comment #18726898
Again, Dmitri, there's plenty of reasons to criticize Elsevier without making things up. RELX doesn't break out profit by division, but the operating margin for Elsevier is around …
-
comment
Comment #18726855
This is something I hear all the time about publishers, and it used to resonate with me, too, until I started to work for a publisher and realized how much goes into the system we …
-
comment
Comment #18726712
Dmitri, I feel like you're being deceptive here. RELX, the parent company of Elsevier, hasn't been involved in this for over a decade, and in fact Lancet led the movement to divest…
-
comment
Comment #18726568
I wish people would work on the systemic issues of access, rather than acting like Elsevier is somehow uniquely responsible. If Elsevier disappeared overnight, there would still be…
-
comment
Comment #14035204
This will be a big deal. People are a bit conflicted in their use of Sci-hub, so there's definitely an appetite for something that works without requiring you to support copyright …
-
comment
Comment #11024567
That's kinda sweet, given what they must have trained the network on. Lots of people say I love you!
-
comment
Comment #8665301
It's not a user's fault they have to root to regain some control over a piece of hardware they own. Your app shouldn't crash under xposed - test for it.
-
comment
Comment #7647809
I'll checkout stirplate.io, but just wanted to point out that there has been a mandate on the books for years now that if you get funding from a federal agency (that does a signifi…
-
comment
Comment #7647781
I personally have always found DeepDyve to be kinda pointless, as when you need to go back and refresh your memory before citing the article later, your access has expired.
-
comment
Comment #7647764
There's a filter in Mendeley's research catalog: http://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/search/?query=%22cat... for showing only open access papers. (disclaimer: my employer)
-
comment
Comment #7647741
I don't work for them (in fact, they could be considered a competitor), but check out PeerJ. $99 per author for an article. PLOS ONE also has fee waivers if you really can't afford…
-
comment
Comment #5682373
So there is a theory that if something doesn't reproduce it's because the other guy was just incompetent, and that may be the case, but just like everyone wants to believe they're …
-
comment
Comment #5682347
It's really critical that we don't confuse research that's nor reproducible with fraud. Very few scientific theories survive unmodified over time, so lack of reproducibility isn't …
-
comment
Comment #5533505
Your assumption is that now Mendeley is going to suddenly shed it's sheep's clothing and reveal itself to be a wolf. As a Mendeley employee (and a scientist, not a PR person), you …
-
comment
Comment #5516646
There will be no favoritism for Elsevier content: http://elsevierconnect.com/elsevier-welcomes-mendeley/