Viewing profile — Mofpofjis
Mofpofjis
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 13, 2025, 3:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 110
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Mofpofjis
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44185667
A commit that was "co-authored-by" 6+ people and has three thousand lines of code: this is a total wreck of a development workflow. This feature should have been implemented with a…
-
comment
Comment #44164992
quick, the address of a burn clinic
-
comment
Comment #44164978
next level: use AI agents in their dating apps on both sides to decide if they want to hook up
-
comment
Comment #44164974
> I make a wall with bricks, even if it will be covered with coating i will do my best to have regular joints and pacing. Absolutely. This is at the core of it.
-
comment
Comment #44164968
> Why would anyone rather read and fix someone else code rather than writing the code themselves? Because their own review standards are low (so they find reviewing "easy"), and/or…
-
comment
Comment #44164895
Strongly agreed. And, your wording is excellent.
-
comment
Comment #44164835
For me, the electric bike analogy works differently: it enables people to ride, regularly, who would not be able to do that with traditional bikes. That's totally fine. But electri…
-
comment
Comment #44164804
There are things that "modulate" this. Violating copyright is never right, of course, some questions are however scale, and purpose. Taking others' creative output, unlicensed, for…
-
comment
Comment #44164783
Agreed. Smartphones are portable, mobile computers that suck at every single aspect of being, and working as, a computer, except for mobility. They are not powerful, they are not g…
-
comment
Comment #44164750
> I got into programming because I like programming, not because I like asking others to write code on my behalf and review what they come up with oh finally someone else who didn'…
-
comment
Comment #44164642
OMG I didn't notice. Way to burn down a huge amount of respect stemming from past cryptography work in just one blog post.
-
comment
Comment #44164585
> I am finding the most destructive aspect of LLM assistance to be the loss of flow state. Finally someone else mentions Flow!
-
comment
Comment #44164521
Wrong. I do pay my general contractor for the unseen quality that goes into the structure of my home. Programs should be built the same way.
-
comment
Comment #44164475
"regular" code review is indeed a total theater, a travesty, a farce. Real , meticulous code review takes absolutely forever.
-
comment
Comment #44164463
then you are a terribly sloppy reviewer
-
comment
Comment #44164457
well said!
-
comment
Comment #44164436
This is actually a good reason for exiting the industry before one's job goes away. Steering AI to barf up the right-looking pool of vomit is not the Flow-generating experience tha…
-
comment
Comment #44164394
> Understanding code takes more effort than writing it yes! > somehow not difficult to explain. Coding is a creative activity where you work top-down; you decompose the abstract/hi…
-
comment
Comment #44164356
> why the hell did I do this? struggling to remember - git blame - always write good commit messages
-
comment
Comment #44164340
This is it. Reading AI slop does not form synapses in your brain like writing the code yourself does.
-
comment
Comment #44164227
> A heartfelt provocation okay then (profanity begets profanity) > Reading other people’s code is part of the job. If you can’t metabolize the boring, repetitive code an LLM genera…
-
comment
Comment #44083900
Evidence to the contrary (anecdotal, admittedly): - https://github.com/EbookFoundation/free-programming-books/is... -- "The most recent freely available draft of C17/C18 used to be…
-
comment
Comment #44083607
I agree with you about the seriousness and heft of POSIX (and I definitely know your name from comp.lang.c[.moderated], so I respect your opinion); however, there is no arbitrary g…
-
comment
Comment #44083565
> Now try to contribute to OpenGroup. Funnily enough, I had ended up contributing to POSIX without trying to. I just participated in mailing list discussions and in the public bug …
-
comment
Comment #44083468
> they could find a home at ECMA where Javascript lives or they could go build their own SDO for purpose One option is https://www.oasis-open.org/