Viewing profile — Mkengin
Mkengin
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 08, 2025, 8:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 12
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Mkengin
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219557
Are you also talking about personal projects? That wouldn't be enough for me for work either, but for personal use, my $20 Codex subscription is perfectly fine. Then again, as a ne…
-
comment
Comment #48249724
There Seen to be more and more harness benchmarks out there, pretty interesting read: https://neuralnoise.com/2026/harness-bench-wip/
-
comment
Comment #47278728
I don't think so, I use GrapheneOS and I think I can't even use the USB-C port for anything other than charging (which should be configurable).
-
comment
Comment #46344815
No, I am not affiliated with the website, I just want to see more discussions based on uncontaminated benchmarks and feel that people rely too much on benchmarks that companies can…
-
comment
Comment #46344698
I would assume that if a tool is there and the alternative too costly that they would use the tool instead of buring their project. Just today I stumbled over this for example, whe…
-
comment
Comment #46344686
Not for coding, but today I stumbled upon these two building their passion project using GenAI, which would otherwise perhaps not be possible: https://reddit.com/comments/1prqfsu
-
comment
Comment #46344670
It doesn't have to be hyped to be used, for example today I found these two building their passion project using GenAI, which would otherwise maybe not possible, who knows: https:/…
-
comment
Comment #46344597
This is just one example, but today I found this where two people build their passion project using GenAI for image generation (+ photoshop), maybe otherwise this project wouldn't …
-
comment
Comment #46319914
Though this Codex version isnt on the leaderboard, GPT-5.2-Medium already seems to be a bit better than Opus 4.5: https://swe-rebench.com/
-
comment
Comment #46319880
At least on swe-rebench it does pretty well: https://swe-rebench.com/
-
comment
Comment #46319840
Your experience seems to match the recent results from swe-rebench: https://swe-rebench.com/
-
comment
Comment #46319821
According to SWE-Rebench Anthropic and OpenAI are really close in performance, while GPT-5.2 costs less than half the cost of CC per problem. https://swe-rebench.com/
-
comment
Comment #46057003
Interesting. So similar to the vision encoder + projector in VLMs?
-
comment
Comment #46040669
I am eagerly awaiting swe-rebench results for November with all the new models: https://swe-rebench.com/
-
comment
Comment #46040641
I like this one: https://swe-rebench.com/
-
comment
Comment #45725802
Or use RL to beat any AI detectors: https://reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1lnrd1t/you_can_jus...
-
comment
Comment #45471991
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13600 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22911 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16167
-
comment
Comment #44835536
Thank you for testing, I will test GPT-OSS for my use case as well. If you're interested I have 8 GB VRAM, 32 GB RAM and get around 21 token/s with tensor offloading, I would assum…
-
comment
Comment #44834767
Why Qwen2.5 and not Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 or Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct?