Viewing profile — Mike_12345
Mike_12345
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 03, 2023, 9:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 173
- Public activity
- 169 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Mike_12345
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35837236
LOL you actually sound like ChatGPT. Are you a LLM?
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35836685
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #35834268
Go to Google Scholar and search for "neurotoxicity of cannabis" You can find studies showing that even pure THC is neurotoxic. It depends on dosage and frequency.
-
comment
Comment #35833398
> Very interesting! I'd love to learn more. Please show us the data supporting this assertion. You can't demand a study/citation for someones personal experience. That is absurd. Y…
-
comment
Comment #35826736
Yes, price = quality because they require supercomputing resources to train. GPT-3 required hundreds of Tesla GPUs running for several weeks. That's millions of dollars just for ha…
-
comment
Comment #35826691
Ask ChatGPT
-
comment
Comment #35824951
> Where is the objectivity? Objectively worse performance in life and in mentally taxing work. It really isn't that complicated. Go smoke a massive bong hit then do a calculus exam…
-
comment
Comment #35824915
> "Basic common sense" is not a synonym for "science". I explained this was my opinion based on experience multiple times so you're just arguing with a strawman. You are absolutely…
-
comment
Comment #35824785
> No, it isn't. It's medicine, and remarkably harmless recreation. Try reading the article before commenting.
-
comment
Comment #35824770
> How do you measure neurotoxicity on yourself? If you consume it, and it subjectively and objectively harms your mental health and cognitive abilities, then basic common sense and…
-
comment
Comment #35824373
> That's not a settled debate; not remotely. In my opinion it is neurotoxic, based on studies I have seen (such as this one that we are commenting on) plus my own direct personal e…
-
comment
Comment #35823396
Isn't that the entire point of the article and study that we are commenting on?
-
comment
Comment #35822818
> I firmly believe that psychedelics are triggers and not the cause of mental disorders If a neurotoxic drug such as cannabis causes psychosis in someone who would otherwise never …
-
comment
Comment #35785923
> if memorized every single result of of a multiplication between two numbers up to the maximum a human can possibly think of, then do I understand multiplication? No, ChatGPT is n…
-
comment
Comment #35783385
Here's a prompt: "If there is a bob outside, and a bib inside, and the bib cannot see the bob, can the bob see the bib?" Answer: "If the bib cannot see the bob due to being inside,…
-
comment
Comment #35783294
Alright so deep learning, the state of the art of AI, is a "party trick". AlphaZero is likewise a party trick. No "true" reasoning involved. > Like actual reasoning. You're relying…
-
comment
Comment #35782546
> Part of my whole point is that LLMs are to NLPs as rockets are to airplanes. Yes it is deep learning applied to NLP. Makes the old designs obsolete > the data is text It is not r…
-
comment
Comment #35782023
Here is an example of an emergent ability of ChatGPT that you can try yourself right now. Give it this prompt: "Write a short play where "Karen" (who behaves as the Karen meme) is …
-
comment
Comment #35781850
It was a straightforward response to "I simply mean his track record of predicting the future trajectory of AI is not great."
-
comment
Comment #35781781
What do you mean we don't have evidence? It has already been presented to you. You choose to reject it for reasons I truly don't understand. Search on Google Scholar if you want a …
-
comment
Comment #35781298
Well he bet on neural networks in the early days when it was unpopular, and that turned out to be the right trajectory. He received a Turing Award for his work that was foundationa…
-
comment
Comment #35781233
Everyone knows it has limitations. You have to work within the limitations of the model. No one has claimed that GPT is AGI. Doesn't mean it's incapable of any degree of reasoning.…
-
comment
Comment #35781112
Also > reasoning in a traditional sense. We are talking about reasoning in a general sense. There are many types of reasoning in AI which I'm sure you know how to look up and read …