Viewing profile — MichaelZuo
MichaelZuo
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 16, 2014, 7:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,857
- Public activity
- 5,434 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About MichaelZuo
mzuo.ca/about
michaelyzuo@gmail.com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49238143
Representing anyone in a court room by definition carries liability risks, because the judge can punish the lawyer unilaterally, but not the AI.
-
comment
Comment #49237597
If errors of over half a typical screwhole width are so common, why has it never been noticed before and reported on? That seems literally impossible to not notice for years on end…
-
comment
Comment #49236353
I don’t see how that helps? A lawyer isn’t going to sign on to take liability risk unless they spend quite a lot of time analyzing the AI’s outputs for possible blunders? So it str…
-
comment
Comment #49221434
Spec committees arent rigid automatons, they can clearly decide on say USB Type C-123 for practical implementation if they chose to.
-
comment
Comment #49215535
Obviously there is some latent risk in choosing a career anywhere, that the demand disappears. There can’t literally be zero risk of structural demand changes.
-
comment
Comment #49215502
So? Is there a hard limit on just one “Type” in the formal name?
-
comment
Comment #49209958
Why not just USB-C Type 123? That allows for 999 possible permutations of usb-c cables.
-
comment
Comment #49209904
This seems to be circular. Wouldn’t anyone need some reading “taste” in the first place to decide to read more. And if they already have it, why would they need to read it? If it’s…
-
comment
Comment #49202319
Then why tack on some gibberish? Just for the heck of it? Frankly, I simply don’t believe in your genuineness enough to care about satisfying any requests.
-
comment
Comment #49202285
Edit: Nevermmind, not going to waste time on this.
-
comment
Comment #49190383
? You’re not even replying to the relevant comment.
-
comment
Comment #49190366
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49176082
I’m not trying to prove anything…? I just don’t care that much either way about what others think if it’s adversarial, even if thousands of HN users come to this comment chain to o…
-
comment
Comment #49175953
Why would Cloudflare want to lose credibility and reputation though? Doesnt seem to make sense.
-
comment
Comment #49175705
Uh are you confused? I’m not the one claiming they refuse to test it, they are the ones who said so.
-
comment
Comment #49175695
How did that compare to the big firms? HPE, Dell, and so on.
-
comment
Comment #49163791
If you dont ever intend to do any testing… then why would anyone care about what you believe or not? Why post random noise opining?
-
comment
Comment #49159014
If you dont believe me… nobody is stopping you from testing various things on the same model? And if you dont have it already… then what could I possibly say that would motivate yo…
-
comment
Comment #49156227
My base 2019 macbook pro 15 on Mojave is actually faster than new macbook pros today on some tasks. There’s no way Apple doesn’t know about that internally. So I don’t see any othe…
-
comment
Comment #49139595
Many people seemingly have trouble grasping that baselines can shift. And then they get into mental contortions as to why getting 2x or 3x better in an absolute sense doesn’t budge…
-
comment
Comment #49139563
This is such a bizarre decision that I’m curious who in the org chart made the call.
-
comment
Comment #49135523
Isn’t it very ironic to post this under a pseudonym? Which by definition contains some signalling that deviates from WYSIWYG.
-
comment
Comment #49127956
The real curious thing is serious C/C++ folks seem like one of the least likely groups imaginable, to want to undergo humiliating and embarrassing blunders… Yet they seemingly don’…
-
comment
Comment #49125561
Is this AI written? I didn’t accuse you of downvoting. It’s literally not possible for HN users to downvote the comment they reply to. Anyone with seemingly over 10k karma would kn…
-
comment
Comment #49122544
Hmmm, so it sounds like the root cause isn’t really about “speed” at all… but something else? For example, someone in a meeting saying things lacking credibility and everyone else …