Viewing profile — MaxGhenis
MaxGhenis
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 27, 2014, 1:38 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 79
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About MaxGhenis
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
story
Show HN: OpenMessage – Google Messages Client for macOS with MCP Server
I built an open-source Google Messages client with a built-in MCP server, so AI assistants like Claude can read, search, and send your texts. It uses the mautrix/gmessages library …
-
story
Show HN: PolicyEngine, a FOSS web app that computes the impact of public policy
PolicyEngine simulates tax and benefit policies. Users can enter their household information in rich detail (hundreds of variables), and we estimate their taxes and benefits; they …
-
comment
Comment #31950113
FWIW, we'll have Maryland income taxes, including local income taxes, by the end of July: https://github.com/policyengine/openfisca-us
-
comment
Comment #31932079
Thanks for the suggestion, I added a link to our documentation ( https://openfisca.us ) to the readme.
-
comment
Comment #31927790
And for all the complexity of the tax code, it often pales in comparison to the version of the tax code we subject low-income families to: rules for means-tested benefits.
-
comment
Comment #31927773
France has also developed the OpenFisca framework [1] for tax and benefit rules as code, and its OpenFisca France [2] model is widely used (I think significantly more than mlang). …
-
comment
Comment #31927590
We've also built an open-source tax and benefit calculator for the UK, which also lets you simulate custom policy reforms: https://policyengine.org/uk
-
comment
Comment #31927522
Fantastic job making taxsim more accessible! We've built an open-source version of taxsim called OpenFisca US [1] which we expose in our (also open-source) web app, PolicyEngine US…
-
comment
Comment #31927443
Agreed. We're building an open source version of taxsim (plus benefit rules) at https://github.com/policyengine/openfisca-us .
-
comment
Comment #31927428
My team at PolicyEngine [1] is also now further reimplementing Tax-Calculator in the Python-based OpenFisca framework [2]. OpenFisca US [3] includes all tax logic in Tax-Calculator…
-
comment
Comment #31927361
SmartAsset is only a rough approximation based on standard deductions/exemptions and the rate structure. It excludes tax credits and other provisions that make taxsim much more acc…
-
comment
Comment #28666604
Our current static approach follows the bulk of public policy analysis, but we do plan to add dynamic responses. For example, https://compute.studio/PSLmodels/Tax-Brain which suppo…
-
comment
Comment #28661335
PolicyEngine lets anyone simulate reforms to the UK tax and benefit system, and see the impact on society and their own household. We're working on building it for the US as well. …
- story
-
comment
Comment #27949973
>Our starting hourly wages are at least $15 per hour for all full time, part time, and seasonal employees and contractors. https://www.aboutamazon.com/workplace/employee-benefits
-
comment
Comment #10996010
Yes I'd like to do that. Net tax burden (taxes - BI) still shouldn't change under the revenue-neutral approach, since they'd be equal between NIT and BI.
-
comment
Comment #10993748
Agreed, though I'd hope that some lessons from basic income could be used in the disability benefit sphere too. The welfare cliffs are devastating and produce severe underemploymen…
-
comment
Comment #10993741
As stated in the article, 50% was chosen only because it's the rate where calculations are simplest, it's not the proposal (it'd generate way more than the current government tax r…
-
comment
Comment #10993359
Do you have sources for the Spain-beach-hitting? Several studies have found that cash transfers do not reduce work incentives, except in specific populations like new mothers and t…
-
comment
Comment #10993345
Very interesting suggestion. I'm also not too familiar with the field, but it seems that most benefits are non-cash (e.g. health and housing), and cash grants tend to be As a count…
-
comment
Comment #10993309
Pegging BI to tax revenue or GDP seems like a good idea to me, though I'd prefer to start with something revenue-neutral like I lay out. As it eliminates welfare cliffs, it seems s…
-
comment
Comment #10993296
Separating (1) children (2) people with disabilities (3) retirees and (4) other adults, is I would say an upper bound on complexity. The PwD piece falls more under healthcare (whic…
-
comment
Comment #10992964
The quote you selected concerns welfare cliffs, where smoothing out the payout curve may slightly reduce benefits of those near a cliff and increase benefits for those just past a …
-
comment
Comment #10992943
Part of the reason I got into BI is because my brother is quadriplegic (spinal cord injury), so I saw firsthand how extreme the welfare cliffs are for the disabled: if he earns ove…
-
comment
Comment #10992681
My goal with this piece is to deconstruct basic income into parallelizable, redistribution-neutral pieces: 1) Replacing non-cash benefits with cash 2) Smoothing the payout curve to…