Viewing profile — Mauneam
Mauneam
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 15, 2024, 3:38 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -12
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Mauneam
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47884548
You are that guy in early 1900s who would rather ride a horse than get in a car because cars "continued to make him uneasy."
-
comment
Comment #46030078
No, it's not the "same as most other languages". C and C++ are actually the only mainstream languages that suffer from UB to this extent. The fact that, in practice, with Rust you …
-
comment
Comment #46029646
We are nowhere near that inflection point!
-
comment
Comment #46029569
First, he didn't call the "crash()" function, he called the "unwrap()" function. The fact that they decided to call the crash function "unwrap()" is not the OP's fault, it's the la…
-
comment
Comment #39432695
> I don't understand? Really? You didn't understand me? That's weird, seeing as you claim to be able to understand none other than God. Contradiction > I've mentioned Aristotle and…
-
comment
Comment #39420102
First you repeat the claim that fine tuning does not commit you to a religion, and then you keep appealing to religion all the way throughout. That's self-refutation at its finest.…
-
comment
Comment #39415323
In an attempt to refute the point about the designer being beyond understanding, you appealed to religion, all the while claiming that you don't have to appeal to religion. Then yo…
-
comment
Comment #39414311
Ahh, theologians have made various claims about the designer? The same people that claim that he showed up as a burning bush one day, and as his own son the next? Theologians have …
-
comment
Comment #39413425
> Where in the argument is the designer defined this way? The argument is, roughly speaking: (1) The fine-tuning of universal constants is due to either physical necessity, chance,…
-
comment
Comment #39403010
In your card example, the theory that posits that you picked the cards intentionally is something that can be subjected to scientific scrutiny. We are allowed to ask where you came…
-
comment
Comment #39398183
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #39398153
It does not explain why the low-probability event of these constants being what they are occurred. It does not explain anything. All it does is move the goalpost for explaining bey…
-
comment
Comment #39393424
They are both goddidit, just dressed up differently (slightly so). There is no baggage. You were trying to sell goddidit here as an "explanation" that should merit the same conside…
-
comment
Comment #39393081
Youdidit is an explanation, because it doesn't terminate the inquisition. You can then ask what caused you, then what caused the thing that caused you, and so on until you get to t…
-
comment
Comment #39393050
That's quite rich, coming from somebody who took a hard line stance, used an abrupt term, put very little effort in and shut down the discussion by calling me a "troll." That said,…
-
comment
Comment #39379148
Saying "because God did it" as an answer to any question has the same value as saying "because pixel cooked the music". If you want to consider those two groups of words "explanati…
-
comment
Comment #39378873
>Well, it explains why the universe is fine-tuned, if you buy the argument. No it doesn't. Goddidit is not an explanation. >Yep, just like any other answer to the question, since i…