Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Marticus

Marticus

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jul 16, 2010, 4:23 PM UTC
HN karma
109
Public activity
79 items

About Marticus

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #1954107

    That... is spectacular...

  4. comment
    Comment #1937161

    I can't help it, but it's my Wave in a box.

  5. comment
    Comment #1902779

    What I don't understand is how exactly it is as you claim it is. My Reddits consist of programming, robotics, science, math, etc.t, and get nothing but positive, helpful feedback a…

  6. comment
    Comment #1893220

    Agreed. I'm pretty sure the message here was "hey you can enhance things and this is usually the most common surgically-enhanced body part," not "women are items and you should mak…

  7. comment
    Comment #1882069

    What makes me really happy is that when me and my roommate discussed how this worked months ago, we eventually explained it exactly as he did in less-equation-y form. Moral of the …

  8. comment
    Comment #1809598

    While I see your point (I agree for the most part), I do hold that while it is being a bit... overconfident(?) I do see that is a problem sometimes in companies. I think it's mostl…

  9. comment
    Comment #1762799

    This was discussed a few days ago, and I completely agree. If you rely on a buggy platform, and it fails, you subsequently have your site fail. This is a perfect example of exactly…

  10. comment
    Comment #1762783

    True fact - CoffeeScript did the same for me even though it was heavily frowned upon by others. Typically I omit them if I can. And I have no reason to do so other than I think it …

  11. comment
    Comment #1761755

    Claiming forgetfulness concerning the key would give you a way out unless they could manage to crack it - at that point you would have dodged the self-incrimination bullet but coul…

  12. comment
    Comment #1732658

    Forcing me to be okay with everyone and their dog seeing what I do on my own time and on a completely different site is unacceptable, and frankly just lazy on their part. That has …

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #1731887

    Well actually I think it's better than jamming the newest (insert band here) album and not be able to hear much other than that and a very dim amount of engine noise. I think it is…

  15. comment
    Comment #1710269

    This is actually quite interesting - I didn't know you could do that, and I will likely employ it in the future, especially with a remote web server or something you can't immediat…

  16. comment
    Comment #1699027

    Plain and simple: She should have driven a harder bargain or not gone for it. Also #3, #3, #3, and #3. People don't read the little bit on Groupon where it says "tip like you're no…

  17. comment
    Comment #1698518

    I believe this is the final answer for water-cooled systems, haha.

  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #1678904

    No joke - ironic from the Linux crowd to bash how timely some corp releases their proprietary data. The person writing the article has been in industry and realises what the prover…

  20. comment
    Comment #1676982

    But the thing is that is religious text, and also isn't particularly inflammatory. We know that religions don't usually accept homosexuality. They're not saying to burn a couple hu…

  21. comment
    Comment #1676843

    It's a ToS agreement for a reason. "You may not publish, transmit or store on or via Rackspace's network and equipment any content or links to any content that Rackspace reasonably…

  22. comment
    Comment #1660940

    See at this point I would be far more amused than furious. A legitimate, helpful response (although it IS SO's login, so.... eh) that's a little bit of a "hey quit being a douche" …

  23. comment
    Comment #1660900

    Yup, now they just need to actually do that with quite a few of their own products and we'd have two happy, completely different corporations that don't release sh*tty software fro…

  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #1659719

    To be fair, they published a paper in 2006. While slow, I can see how something like this would need heavily evidence-supported data to be even remotely non-laughable in even scien…